<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: iDefrag for OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x</link>
	<description>Tech News, Reviews and Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:43:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Georgia</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-190603</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-190603</guid>
		<description>Excellent review. You&#039;ve managed to talk me into buying it.
So far, I&#039;ve defragmented in online mode, in the hopes that it might make the eventual process of a full defragmentation not take quite as long.
It took 5 or so hours just for my computer (Macbook, Intel Core 2 Duo, Software Version 10.5.8, 2GB Ram etc..) to complete the online defragging.

I&#039;ve needed to partition my disk for a while now, but because of fragmented files I was unable to. The online defrag sped up my computer phenomenally, but it wasn&#039;t quite enough to allow the creation for a partition. Hopefully the full defrag kicks this problem to the curb! I have faith ;D

Georgia out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent review. You&#8217;ve managed to talk me into buying it.<br />
So far, I&#8217;ve defragmented in online mode, in the hopes that it might make the eventual process of a full defragmentation not take quite as long.<br />
It took 5 or so hours just for my computer (Macbook, Intel Core 2 Duo, Software Version 10.5.8, 2GB Ram etc..) to complete the online defragging.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve needed to partition my disk for a while now, but because of fragmented files I was unable to. The online defrag sped up my computer phenomenally, but it wasn&#8217;t quite enough to allow the creation for a partition. Hopefully the full defrag kicks this problem to the curb! I have faith ;D</p>
<p>Georgia out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Following Ian: Exploits of day to day life&#8230;. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Indie+Relief</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-188561</link>
		<dc:creator>Following Ian: Exploits of day to day life&#8230;. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Indie+Relief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-188561</guid>
		<description>[...] let you know, I bought iDefrag. (You can find a review of the product here) Can&#8217;t wait to see the difference on my mac&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let you know, I bought iDefrag. (You can find a review of the product here) Can&#8217;t wait to see the difference on my mac&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisp</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-181535</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-181535</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone.  The length of this thread is testimony itself to this subject.
My iBook is four years old, and slowed down so much it became intolerable.  I had to wait minutes sometimes.  The internet was very very slow, I thought it was my net connection.

I took the leap and bought this software.  It was either that or more RAM or a new mac or something.  This was not an expensive option.  I ran the software inline to start with and noticed a snappier performance.  I then took the plunge and made a bootable disc.  It was easy to do.

My poor computer took the whole day yesterday running the program.

The result is, my hard drive has been put back together, and it is like having a new machine.  BRILLIANT.  thanks Paul for this review.

I would strongly recommend this software.  The image of my hard drive showed complete chaos.  NOW I have order again, and functionality is back.

Chrisp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone.  The length of this thread is testimony itself to this subject.<br />
My iBook is four years old, and slowed down so much it became intolerable.  I had to wait minutes sometimes.  The internet was very very slow, I thought it was my net connection.</p>
<p>I took the leap and bought this software.  It was either that or more RAM or a new mac or something.  This was not an expensive option.  I ran the software inline to start with and noticed a snappier performance.  I then took the plunge and made a bootable disc.  It was easy to do.</p>
<p>My poor computer took the whole day yesterday running the program.</p>
<p>The result is, my hard drive has been put back together, and it is like having a new machine.  BRILLIANT.  thanks Paul for this review.</p>
<p>I would strongly recommend this software.  The image of my hard drive showed complete chaos.  NOW I have order again, and functionality is back.</p>
<p>Chrisp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-174683</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-174683</guid>
		<description>huh? what are you referring to- something in the blog post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh? what are you referring to- something in the blog post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-174682</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-174682</guid>
		<description>Lose. It&#039;s spelled LOSE. As in lose data during a power failure.

Loose, is used as in , your shoelaces are loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lose. It&#8217;s spelled LOSE. As in lose data during a power failure.</p>
<p>Loose, is used as in , your shoelaces are loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paunchiness</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-169567</link>
		<dc:creator>Paunchiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-169567</guid>
		<description>Just downloaded this thing and it&#039;s currently churning on my drive... I&#039;ll let you know how it goes but so far so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just downloaded this thing and it&#8217;s currently churning on my drive&#8230; I&#8217;ll let you know how it goes but so far so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-158991</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-158991</guid>
		<description>Tip: You don&#039;t need to use a CD, you can boot into firewire mode and defrag from another mac.

Peace
-stephan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tip: You don&#8217;t need to use a CD, you can boot into firewire mode and defrag from another mac.</p>
<p>Peace<br />
-stephan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-158985</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-158985</guid>
		<description>I also bought iDefrag. It&#039;s a must when you want to work with boot camp because OS X places it&#039;s swap file in the empty part of your application, and can&#039;t move it if your drive is fragmented.

Boot camp assistant should compact the drive in a way that it can fit the e.g. 2gb swap file somewhere in between. 

Full backup and restore is not an option for most people. $30 well spent.

Peace
-stephan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also bought iDefrag. It&#8217;s a must when you want to work with boot camp because OS X places it&#8217;s swap file in the empty part of your application, and can&#8217;t move it if your drive is fragmented.</p>
<p>Boot camp assistant should compact the drive in a way that it can fit the e.g. 2gb swap file somewhere in between. </p>
<p>Full backup and restore is not an option for most people. $30 well spent.</p>
<p>Peace<br />
-stephan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is File Fragmentation?</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-150914</link>
		<dc:creator>What is File Fragmentation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-150914</guid>
		<description>[...] OS X users who wish to defragment must use third party applications. They should check out this useful article on defragmentation from Paul Stamatiou, and consider purchasing iDefrag from Coriolis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OS X users who wish to defragment must use third party applications. They should check out this useful article on defragmentation from Paul Stamatiou, and consider purchasing iDefrag from Coriolis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: investigativeblog.net &#187; links for 2007-10-12</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-145523</link>
		<dc:creator>investigativeblog.net &#187; links for 2007-10-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-145523</guid>
		<description>[...] Review: iDefrag for OS X - PaulStamatiou.com (tags: idefrag ipartition) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review: iDefrag for OS X &#8211; PaulStamatiou.com (tags: idefrag ipartition) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-142651</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-142651</guid>
		<description>Daniel:

Fragmentation occurs due to many many things:

1. Files being deleted, and a file with the EXACT same number of bytes is not put in its place, the file will become fragmented.

2. Virtual Memory/swap file exceeding the pre-sized area on the drive.

3. Application updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel:</p>
<p>Fragmentation occurs due to many many things:</p>
<p>1. Files being deleted, and a file with the EXACT same number of bytes is not put in its place, the file will become fragmented.</p>
<p>2. Virtual Memory/swap file exceeding the pre-sized area on the drive.</p>
<p>3. Application updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-142495</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-142495</guid>
		<description>Thanks to and Dan for directly answering my questions posted on November 26.  One at 4:36 AM and another immediately following at 4:51 AM.

Correct me if I&#039;m wrong:  if there is always  enough contiguous space on a drive for a file to be moved to,  fragmentation will never occur.

In my case, as I mentioned earlier in my first posting, where I keep all media files including my Itunes Music folder on separate volumes; my main 250 gig drive named by default Macintosh HD contains nothing but Mac OSX Tiger and my applications and related files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to and Dan for directly answering my questions posted on November 26.  One at 4:36 AM and another immediately following at 4:51 AM.</p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong:  if there is always  enough contiguous space on a drive for a file to be moved to,  fragmentation will never occur.</p>
<p>In my case, as I mentioned earlier in my first posting, where I keep all media files including my Itunes Music folder on separate volumes; my main 250 gig drive named by default Macintosh HD contains nothing but Mac OSX Tiger and my applications and related files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isabella</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-142481</link>
		<dc:creator>isabella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-142481</guid>
		<description>Hi
I am having problems with VST instruments in cubase. Am thinking of running iDefrag. Is it ok for a Powerbook G4? I&#039;m on osx 10.4.10. I think its osx tiger?
isabella</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I am having problems with VST instruments in cubase. Am thinking of running iDefrag. Is it ok for a Powerbook G4? I&#8217;m on osx 10.4.10. I think its osx tiger?<br />
isabella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-142353</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-142353</guid>
		<description>How do i connect using the firewire? i have the G% i need to defrag and the firewire connected to an older emac? is this ok? how do i do Target Disk Mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do i connect using the firewire? i have the G% i need to defrag and the firewire connected to an older emac? is this ok? how do i do Target Disk Mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s (we)Blog &#187; Defragmenting a Mac OS X hard disk</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-124652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s (we)Blog &#187; Defragmenting a Mac OS X hard disk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-124652</guid>
		<description>[...] there is a third party utility availabilty (if I was prepared to pay for it), called iDefrag (Paul Stamatiou has a review of iDefrag on his site) but in the end, I used Mike Bombich&#8217;s Carbon Copy Cloner to clone my hard disk to my backup [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is a third party utility availabilty (if I was prepared to pay for it), called iDefrag (Paul Stamatiou has a review of iDefrag on his site) but in the end, I used Mike Bombich&#8217;s Carbon Copy Cloner to clone my hard disk to my backup [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan2</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-123233</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-123233</guid>
		<description>I use the complete recopy method as a defrag method all the time.  I actually use a variation where I make a disk image and then reimage my computer.

1. boot computer with fragmented drive in target disk mode.
2. use another computer to make image of computer with fragmented drive.  Often this requires an external hard drive simply because of the size of the disk image.  It is faster if you don&#039;t compress the image.  I do, so I can keep the image as a archive.
3.  Wipe fragmented drive
4.  Re-image fragmented drive with image.
5.  Reboot the computer in target disk mode in order to let it start up normally.  You will never know that the computer&#039;s drive was ever wiped, it looks like how you left it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the complete recopy method as a defrag method all the time.  I actually use a variation where I make a disk image and then reimage my computer.</p>
<p>1. boot computer with fragmented drive in target disk mode.<br />
2. use another computer to make image of computer with fragmented drive.  Often this requires an external hard drive simply because of the size of the disk image.  It is faster if you don&#8217;t compress the image.  I do, so I can keep the image as a archive.<br />
3.  Wipe fragmented drive<br />
4.  Re-image fragmented drive with image.<br />
5.  Reboot the computer in target disk mode in order to let it start up normally.  You will never know that the computer&#8217;s drive was ever wiped, it looks like how you left it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolley</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-103956</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-103956</guid>
		<description>Hi, well add me to the list. iDefrag resurrected the incredible performance of my iMac Core Duo.
It is intuitive enough and looked good enough for me to entrust it my drive. Apple should buy a license to include this software in all Macs. My Core Duo, fairly recent, was subject to slow disk access (launch app, open new document, spotlight...), way too slow. While I am glad iDefrag works very well, I am kind of puzzled at how OSX&#039;s performance degraded over such a small lapse of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, well add me to the list. iDefrag resurrected the incredible performance of my iMac Core Duo.<br />
It is intuitive enough and looked good enough for me to entrust it my drive. Apple should buy a license to include this software in all Macs. My Core Duo, fairly recent, was subject to slow disk access (launch app, open new document, spotlight&#8230;), way too slow. While I am glad iDefrag works very well, I am kind of puzzled at how OSX&#8217;s performance degraded over such a small lapse of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick S</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-96761</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-96761</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;iDefrag should NOT be run if you suspect any sort of OS problems, file problems, or disk problems. iDefrag uses a variety of safeguards against data loss and errors, but any one of those problems increases astronomically the probability of failure.&lt;/i&gt;

Caveat whatnot: I&#039;m not going to say that iDefrag killed my iBook&#039;s hard drive, but the effort of defragging it appears to have pushed it over the edge into click-of-deathsville, and into the waiting arms of the AppleCare techs. (Yes, I backed up first, thankfully.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>iDefrag should NOT be run if you suspect any sort of OS problems, file problems, or disk problems. iDefrag uses a variety of safeguards against data loss and errors, but any one of those problems increases astronomically the probability of failure.</i></p>
<p>Caveat whatnot: I&#8217;m not going to say that iDefrag killed my iBook&#8217;s hard drive, but the effort of defragging it appears to have pushed it over the edge into click-of-deathsville, and into the waiting arms of the AppleCare techs. (Yes, I backed up first, thankfully.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Thomas</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-89024</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-89024</guid>
		<description>Just purchased iDefrag after doing the research, what the heck, took a chance on $30.00. I do alot of music and video editing and felt the need for speed. Ran iDefrag, took about 6 hrs on my Power Mac G5 2.5. Seems to run faster and no more spinning beach ball. Give it a shot folks, only $30.00 and you&#039;ll have peace of mind, at least until another OS comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just purchased iDefrag after doing the research, what the heck, took a chance on $30.00. I do alot of music and video editing and felt the need for speed. Ran iDefrag, took about 6 hrs on my Power Mac G5 2.5. Seems to run faster and no more spinning beach ball. Give it a shot folks, only $30.00 and you&#8217;ll have peace of mind, at least until another OS comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-88320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-88320</guid>
		<description>There is a method of defragging that is free, provided the materials are available. It is called the &quot;Hucky&quot; method. I am extremely unfamiliar with the details, but here is what i know:

This method works by copying your entire drive, system and all, to a blank drive, say an external drive or a server, formatting the first disk, then copying everything back.

In doing this, all files will be written contiguously on the first copy.

The pros (Again, from what i know) are that it is simple, requires no third party software, and can be quicker.

The cons are that it does not prioritize data or files based on rules (Like iDefrag), which means files are written in a dumb way.
iDefrag will make sure all system files are written first, in the faster section of the drive, and then files and applications you use the most, etc. based on pre-coded rules, that are customizable, though not easily. It also requires hardware, mainly another drive big enough for the contents of the first, and an enclosure.

Personally, i wish i could use an external drive as a &quot;scratch&quot; drive for iDefrag, thereby getting the speed of 2 drives, and the smart defragging of my disk.

As for restoring from a non-system backup (certain files or folders only), it depends what program, but data will be written into available space on the disk. Restoring from a full system backup will be essentially the &quot;Hucky&quot; method explained above, provided that the drive is formatted.

Hope this helps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a method of defragging that is free, provided the materials are available. It is called the &#8220;Hucky&#8221; method. I am extremely unfamiliar with the details, but here is what i know:</p>
<p>This method works by copying your entire drive, system and all, to a blank drive, say an external drive or a server, formatting the first disk, then copying everything back.</p>
<p>In doing this, all files will be written contiguously on the first copy.</p>
<p>The pros (Again, from what i know) are that it is simple, requires no third party software, and can be quicker.</p>
<p>The cons are that it does not prioritize data or files based on rules (Like iDefrag), which means files are written in a dumb way.<br />
iDefrag will make sure all system files are written first, in the faster section of the drive, and then files and applications you use the most, etc. based on pre-coded rules, that are customizable, though not easily. It also requires hardware, mainly another drive big enough for the contents of the first, and an enclosure.</p>
<p>Personally, i wish i could use an external drive as a &#8220;scratch&#8221; drive for iDefrag, thereby getting the speed of 2 drives, and the smart defragging of my disk.</p>
<p>As for restoring from a non-system backup (certain files or folders only), it depends what program, but data will be written into available space on the disk. Restoring from a full system backup will be essentially the &#8220;Hucky&#8221; method explained above, provided that the drive is formatted.</p>
<p>Hope this helps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-86647</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-86647</guid>
		<description>Now I see that Diskwarrior doesn&#039;t actually defrag the files but only optimizes the directory.  And that I iDefrag actually is defragging, rearraning fragments into contiguous files in 5 hours, but what does restoring a drive from a backup do?  Will not the files be restored contiguously from any backup program? Or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I see that Diskwarrior doesn&#8217;t actually defrag the files but only optimizes the directory.  And that I iDefrag actually is defragging, rearraning fragments into contiguous files in 5 hours, but what does restoring a drive from a backup do?  Will not the files be restored contiguously from any backup program? Or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-85866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-85866</guid>
		<description>When a file is deleted, by default, only its reference in the Directory is deleted. The zeroes and ones that are the data are still in YourDrivesVille. Erasing free space takes all the space on your drive that does not have an entry in the directory, (which by the way makes it free game for new files) and replaces it with either gibberish or straight zeroes. This is usually done for security, like before handing off a computer to someone, while still keeping a basic system.

Again, hope this post clears some things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a file is deleted, by default, only its reference in the Directory is deleted. The zeroes and ones that are the data are still in YourDrivesVille. Erasing free space takes all the space on your drive that does not have an entry in the directory, (which by the way makes it free game for new files) and replaces it with either gibberish or straight zeroes. This is usually done for security, like before handing off a computer to someone, while still keeping a basic system.</p>
<p>Again, hope this post clears some things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-85862</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-85862</guid>
		<description>Diskwarrior and iDefrag are two different beasts.

A hard drive saves data in the file zone, and then makes an entry into the Directory, a special place on your drive dedicated to refrences to files. The Directory is like a map of YourDrivesVille. It shows you where things are, and how to get there. But to get the file, the drive head still has to go wherever the map tells it to.

Diskwarrior takes your directory data, not the files themselves, and defrags it, as well as optimizing it by placing the most used portions of the directory where it can be accessed the quickest. In addition, it corrects any Directory errors or missing / corrupt files as it goes.

This is like taking the current map, and checking it for accuracy and discrepancies, and noting what could be better. It will (hypothetically) make the most used files in bold print for easy access, and make sure there is no dead space in the map.

This app is a life saver when apps are quitting on launch (likely because it cannot find a file due to incomplete /  bad directory data.),  and/or certain folders make the Finder crash, or files cannot be found.

iDefrag actually rips everything in YourDrivesVille out of the ground, and rearranges it according to various rules. It will try to place the most used files in the easiest places to reach, and try to have all files in one piece, not scattered across the map, which would make the drive head play scavenger hunt with your data.

After all of this, iDefrag creates a new directory with all the changes.

iDefrag is most useful when your computer is &quot;chugging&quot;, slower, or you recently finished a big audiovisual project.

In recap, Diskwarrior is a good first response to suspected file problems, and great for speeding things up a bit. As it only works with the Directory, your files are still fragmented, but the index is not.

iDefrag should NOT be run if you suspect any sort of OS problems, file problems, or disk problems. iDefrag uses a variety of safeguards against data loss and errors, but any one of those problems increases astronomically the probability of failure. 

I have, and use, both. They have helped tremendously, and I am grateful that they exist. 

Hope this post clears some things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diskwarrior and iDefrag are two different beasts.</p>
<p>A hard drive saves data in the file zone, and then makes an entry into the Directory, a special place on your drive dedicated to refrences to files. The Directory is like a map of YourDrivesVille. It shows you where things are, and how to get there. But to get the file, the drive head still has to go wherever the map tells it to.</p>
<p>Diskwarrior takes your directory data, not the files themselves, and defrags it, as well as optimizing it by placing the most used portions of the directory where it can be accessed the quickest. In addition, it corrects any Directory errors or missing / corrupt files as it goes.</p>
<p>This is like taking the current map, and checking it for accuracy and discrepancies, and noting what could be better. It will (hypothetically) make the most used files in bold print for easy access, and make sure there is no dead space in the map.</p>
<p>This app is a life saver when apps are quitting on launch (likely because it cannot find a file due to incomplete /  bad directory data.),  and/or certain folders make the Finder crash, or files cannot be found.</p>
<p>iDefrag actually rips everything in YourDrivesVille out of the ground, and rearranges it according to various rules. It will try to place the most used files in the easiest places to reach, and try to have all files in one piece, not scattered across the map, which would make the drive head play scavenger hunt with your data.</p>
<p>After all of this, iDefrag creates a new directory with all the changes.</p>
<p>iDefrag is most useful when your computer is &#8220;chugging&#8221;, slower, or you recently finished a big audiovisual project.</p>
<p>In recap, Diskwarrior is a good first response to suspected file problems, and great for speeding things up a bit. As it only works with the Directory, your files are still fragmented, but the index is not.</p>
<p>iDefrag should NOT be run if you suspect any sort of OS problems, file problems, or disk problems. iDefrag uses a variety of safeguards against data loss and errors, but any one of those problems increases astronomically the probability of failure. </p>
<p>I have, and use, both. They have helped tremendously, and I am grateful that they exist. </p>
<p>Hope this post clears some things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remi</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-85216</link>
		<dc:creator>Remi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-85216</guid>
		<description>iDefrag rocks. I&#039;m running Tiger on a iBook G4. 
I purchased iDefrag since the demo version is unusable (100MB limitation), and to my great pleasure the software comes with CDMaker. I have successfully tried it (dowloading System Files from the internet, 175MB, took about 20-25 minutes), it automatically adds iDefrag on the CD. After burning the CD, you can boot up by restarting your mac and holding down the &#039;c&#039; key while it boots. Hold down the key until you see the gray apple logo with the spinning circle. 

Upon booting you can launch iDefrag and perform a Full Defrag. It takes a while but the performance gain are worth it. Since I was running on a laptop I could safely check the checkbox in preferences that says &#039;overlap writes&#039; since even a power failure would not turn off the harddrive. 

About &#039;You Don&#039;t Need To Defrag On Mac OS X&#039;: WRONG. Mac OS does indeed some kind of defrag in the background. The way it&#039;s done is that everytime a file is opened, Mac OS will check if it has 8 fragments or more and uses less than 20 MB. In that case it will defragment the file and move it on the drive. However in my case, it seems that I no longer had enough free contiguous space for that operation to succeed, so system.log kept repeating this line over and over:
hfs_relocate: didn&#039;t move into metadata zone
Although no performance hit were experienced, it was extremely irritating since that useless log what preventing the HD to sleep (I leave my laptop on 24/24). No thanks to apple for warning the user about anything at all, and no thanks for not even putting this warning or the whole auto-defrag mecanism as a user-preference..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iDefrag rocks. I&#8217;m running Tiger on a iBook G4.<br />
I purchased iDefrag since the demo version is unusable (100MB limitation), and to my great pleasure the software comes with CDMaker. I have successfully tried it (dowloading System Files from the internet, 175MB, took about 20-25 minutes), it automatically adds iDefrag on the CD. After burning the CD, you can boot up by restarting your mac and holding down the &#8216;c&#8217; key while it boots. Hold down the key until you see the gray apple logo with the spinning circle. </p>
<p>Upon booting you can launch iDefrag and perform a Full Defrag. It takes a while but the performance gain are worth it. Since I was running on a laptop I could safely check the checkbox in preferences that says &#8216;overlap writes&#8217; since even a power failure would not turn off the harddrive. </p>
<p>About &#8216;You Don&#8217;t Need To Defrag On Mac OS X&#8217;: WRONG. Mac OS does indeed some kind of defrag in the background. The way it&#8217;s done is that everytime a file is opened, Mac OS will check if it has 8 fragments or more and uses less than 20 MB. In that case it will defragment the file and move it on the drive. However in my case, it seems that I no longer had enough free contiguous space for that operation to succeed, so system.log kept repeating this line over and over:<br />
hfs_relocate: didn&#8217;t move into metadata zone<br />
Although no performance hit were experienced, it was extremely irritating since that useless log what preventing the HD to sleep (I leave my laptop on 24/24). No thanks to apple for warning the user about anything at all, and no thanks for not even putting this warning or the whole auto-defrag mecanism as a user-preference..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-idefrag-for-os-x#comment-53897</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/01/05/review-idefrag-for-os-x/#comment-53897</guid>
		<description>Oh by the way, I never noticed the &quot;erase free space button&quot; in the erase pane of Disk Utility.  Does it help to erase free space on a disk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh by the way, I never noticed the &#8220;erase free space button&#8221; in the erase pane of Disk Utility.  Does it help to erase free space on a disk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
