<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: FeedLounge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge</link>
	<description>Tech News, Reviews and Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:07:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-8062</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 07:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-8062</guid>
		<description>Alex

Is there a limit on the humber of feeds that you can assign to a specific tag?  I have some that I cannot edit no matter how many times I click on info and add a tag.  Just curious, as I like to organize things in collapsable groups.  Great job at any rate! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex</p>
<p>Is there a limit on the humber of feeds that you can assign to a specific tag?  I have some that I cannot edit no matter how many times I click on info and add a tag.  Just curious, as I like to organize things in collapsable groups.  Great job at any rate! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7826</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7826</guid>
		<description>CC--

If there is one thing I&#039;ve learned from FeedLounge, it is that people have a wide variety of reading preferences. I wanted to make sude you were aware of our three reading views:

http://feedlounge.com/support/tutorial/read/

I personally use a similar approach to the one you describe. I use the 3 column view (the second option in FeedLounge) to do so.

The list of items allows me to read the item title and the source, then I click or arrow key to the ones I&#039;m interested in and read them in the viewpane.

To expand on previous comment regarding people&#039;s first feed reading experience, it&#039;s again born from the feedback we&#039;ve received from FeedLounge users. The users that were previously NetNewsWire or FeedDemon users love FeedLounge&#039;s 3 pane interfaces - they love being able to have &quot;the power of a desktop interface on the web.&quot; Conversely, folks who are longtime Bloglines users eschew both of these views in favor of the River of News view - and they consistently ask us to make the reading experience more like the experience Bloglines offers.

Now of course these are sweeping generalizations and there are exceptions, but the above if true in the 80+% case. The diversity certainly makes things interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC&#8211;</p>
<p>If there is one thing I&#8217;ve learned from FeedLounge, it is that people have a wide variety of reading preferences. I wanted to make sude you were aware of our three reading views:</p>
<p><a href="http://feedlounge.com/support/tutorial/read/" rel="nofollow">http://feedlounge.com/support/tutorial/read/</a></p>
<p>I personally use a similar approach to the one you describe. I use the 3 column view (the second option in FeedLounge) to do so.</p>
<p>The list of items allows me to read the item title and the source, then I click or arrow key to the ones I&#8217;m interested in and read them in the viewpane.</p>
<p>To expand on previous comment regarding people&#8217;s first feed reading experience, it&#8217;s again born from the feedback we&#8217;ve received from FeedLounge users. The users that were previously NetNewsWire or FeedDemon users love FeedLounge&#8217;s 3 pane interfaces &#8211; they love being able to have &#8220;the power of a desktop interface on the web.&#8221; Conversely, folks who are longtime Bloglines users eschew both of these views in favor of the River of News view &#8211; and they consistently ask us to make the reading experience more like the experience Bloglines offers.</p>
<p>Now of course these are sweeping generalizations and there are exceptions, but the above if true in the 80+% case. The diversity certainly makes things interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrono Cr@cker</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7719</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrono Cr@cker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7719</guid>
		<description>@Alex: Hmm...I really don&#039;t get the point you were trying to convey to me. I started both Web-based and Desktop at the same time. However my friends who started to use Desk-B, have converted to some online service, thanks to the advantages.

Okay, I really went and tried feedlounge once again after writing that comment, it&#039;s been long as I had checked out screenies quite sometime ago and this time I wanted to get more of a feel since this review had really recommended it.

I must admit, it was slick, fast and feature rich... And seriously better than Bloglines and the rest. But I&#039;m a feed devourer and view tons and tons of headlines everyday.  Feedlounge doesn&#039;t suit me. The way of reading feeds - Like outlook express, is good but is not the way I prefer as time would be wasted a lot. I filter my posts based on headlines and thus I wanna give more space to the content.

But nevertheless, great service. Good work! I can&#039;t really buy it as I have no online money account, but great job anyway.FL should ask for readers comments on the above reading feeds and give options to the readers as to how they can read feeds.

~ CC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex: Hmm&#8230;I really don&#8217;t get the point you were trying to convey to me. I started both Web-based and Desktop at the same time. However my friends who started to use Desk-B, have converted to some online service, thanks to the advantages.</p>
<p>Okay, I really went and tried feedlounge once again after writing that comment, it&#8217;s been long as I had checked out screenies quite sometime ago and this time I wanted to get more of a feel since this review had really recommended it.</p>
<p>I must admit, it was slick, fast and feature rich&#8230; And seriously better than Bloglines and the rest. But I&#8217;m a feed devourer and view tons and tons of headlines everyday.  Feedlounge doesn&#8217;t suit me. The way of reading feeds &#8211; Like outlook express, is good but is not the way I prefer as time would be wasted a lot. I filter my posts based on headlines and thus I wanna give more space to the content.</p>
<p>But nevertheless, great service. Good work! I can&#8217;t really buy it as I have no online money account, but great job anyway.FL should ask for readers comments on the above reading feeds and give options to the readers as to how they can read feeds.</p>
<p>~ CC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog of Leonid Mamchenkov &#187; Daily del.icio.us bookmarks</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog of Leonid Mamchenkov &#187; Daily del.icio.us bookmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 09:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>[...] PaulStamatiou.com Â» Review: FeedLounge Tagged as: aggregator atom feed review reviews rss syndication tools webservices wordpress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PaulStamatiou.com Â» Review: FeedLounge Tagged as: aggregator atom feed review reviews rss syndication tools webservices wordpress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7676</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 22:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7676</guid>
		<description>Flushing your local DNS tables will also fix this. :)  Thanks for the update Alex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flushing your local DNS tables will also fix this. :)  Thanks for the update Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7633</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7633</guid>
		<description>Actually, FeedLounge has been up this entire time - it&#039;s a DNS problem causing you difficulty in getting to the site and service..

FeedLounge (the web service) is hosted in a co-lo in San Francisco, while the FeedLounge web site is hosted in a data center in New Jersey with the rest of Scott and my web sites hosted on a dedicated server in Austin, TX. Unfortunately, the box in Austin, TX was the primary DNS server for all of these and it burned up on Sunday morning (about 22 hours ago) causing the difficulty in getting to the FeedLounge web site and service.

Hopefully the DNS change has made it to you by now. If it hasn&#039;t, please add 65.90.218.228 to your list of DNS servers in the interim so you can access FeedLounge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, FeedLounge has been up this entire time &#8211; it&#8217;s a DNS problem causing you difficulty in getting to the site and service..</p>
<p>FeedLounge (the web service) is hosted in a co-lo in San Francisco, while the FeedLounge web site is hosted in a data center in New Jersey with the rest of Scott and my web sites hosted on a dedicated server in Austin, TX. Unfortunately, the box in Austin, TX was the primary DNS server for all of these and it burned up on Sunday morning (about 22 hours ago) causing the difficulty in getting to the FeedLounge web site and service.</p>
<p>Hopefully the DNS change has made it to you by now. If it hasn&#8217;t, please add 65.90.218.228 to your list of DNS servers in the interim so you can access FeedLounge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7591</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 09:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never experienced downtime like this before.  I wonder what&#039;s up... or shall I say down.  (bad pun)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never experienced downtime like this before.  I wonder what&#8217;s up&#8230; or shall I say down.  (bad pun)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantinos Kouloumbris</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7588</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantinos Kouloumbris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7588</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Thanks for the review. Do you have any inside info on why is the service down? We would like to try it out but it&#039;s down for more than 4h. Is this a regular thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Thanks for the review. Do you have any inside info on why is the service down? We would like to try it out but it&#8217;s down for more than 4h. Is this a regular thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7536</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 08:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7536</guid>
		<description>I signed up for the service, it was exactly what I was looking for!  But all today I have been unable to access thie site at all.  Has anyone else noticed this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up for the service, it was exactly what I was looking for!  But all today I have been unable to access thie site at all.  Has anyone else noticed this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonid Mamchenkov</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7528</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonid Mamchenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 07:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7528</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a review.  I am desperate to try it out, but it&#039;s currently down. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a review.  I am desperate to try it out, but it&#8217;s currently down. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7519</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 04:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7519</guid>
		<description>Oops seems like I was wrong about how old FeedLounge was.  I went by the first blog post.  So the blog has been up about a year, FeedLounge has only been public for about 4 months. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops seems like I was wrong about how old FeedLounge was.  I went by the first blog post.  So the blog has been up about a year, FeedLounge has only been public for about 4 months. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7518</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 04:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7518</guid>
		<description>Nice review Paul, thanks! Just a quick FYI - for the past couple of months we&#039;ve been quietly refreshing the feeds on a much faster schedule: refresh all feeds every 4 hours or faster (depending on post frequency) and if a feed supports sending 301 headers, we refresh it every 30 minutes regardless of the time between posts. We&#039;re still experimenting to find the right mix and make sure we can scale it before we announce it officially.

A few other notes:

Shawn Anthony - the service has been public since mid-January this year (approximately 4 months).

Chrono Cr@cker - it&#039;s interesting to see the difference in expectations of feed reader interfaces between folks that started on desktop readers and folks taht started on web-based readers.

Ryan Humphreys - we released our Notifier API recently, and there is already an OS X widget using it. I expect we&#039;ll have a full suite of notifiers fairly soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Paul, thanks! Just a quick FYI &#8211; for the past couple of months we&#8217;ve been quietly refreshing the feeds on a much faster schedule: refresh all feeds every 4 hours or faster (depending on post frequency) and if a feed supports sending 301 headers, we refresh it every 30 minutes regardless of the time between posts. We&#8217;re still experimenting to find the right mix and make sure we can scale it before we announce it officially.</p>
<p>A few other notes:</p>
<p>Shawn Anthony &#8211; the service has been public since mid-January this year (approximately 4 months).</p>
<p>Chrono Cr@cker &#8211; it&#8217;s interesting to see the difference in expectations of feed reader interfaces between folks that started on desktop readers and folks taht started on web-based readers.</p>
<p>Ryan Humphreys &#8211; we released our Notifier API recently, and there is already an OS X widget using it. I expect we&#8217;ll have a full suite of notifiers fairly soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Punsalan</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7479</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Punsalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7479</guid>
		<description>Great review Paul. I almost forgot that I was subscribed to the service. After I dropped the yearly fee and began using the service on a daily (almost hourly) basis, the realization that a renewal at years end totally slipped my mind. The service definitely pays for itself. 

I haven&#039;t frequented the boards in awhile but I do know that there is one feature I am yearning for... The option to search through read items rather than having to scroll through manually. With so much content coming through, I sometimes forget to flag or tag an item of interest and am forced to go through the history by hand. 

Aside from that little minor detail, I would never hesitate to recommend the service to others. Alex King and the gang have a superb support group and often answer bugs or reports in the forums near quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review Paul. I almost forgot that I was subscribed to the service. After I dropped the yearly fee and began using the service on a daily (almost hourly) basis, the realization that a renewal at years end totally slipped my mind. The service definitely pays for itself. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t frequented the boards in awhile but I do know that there is one feature I am yearning for&#8230; The option to search through read items rather than having to scroll through manually. With so much content coming through, I sometimes forget to flag or tag an item of interest and am forced to go through the history by hand. </p>
<p>Aside from that little minor detail, I would never hesitate to recommend the service to others. Alex King and the gang have a superb support group and often answer bugs or reports in the forums near quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 18:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7413</guid>
		<description>Neat review Paul. 

I don&#039;t know about paying subscriptions... it&#039;s an endless overhead no matter how good something is. I bought Netnewswire and it syncs ith Newsgator, which isn&#039;t ajax, but works just like Netnewswire but online. They sync, and I&#039;m happy since I can read my subscriptions, whether I&#039;m on my machine or someone else&#039;s. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat review Paul. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about paying subscriptions&#8230; it&#8217;s an endless overhead no matter how good something is. I bought Netnewswire and it syncs ith Newsgator, which isn&#8217;t ajax, but works just like Netnewswire but online. They sync, and I&#8217;m happy since I can read my subscriptions, whether I&#8217;m on my machine or someone else&#8217;s. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Bullock</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bullock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 13:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7319</guid>
		<description>I currentlt use NewsGator Online.  How does it compare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currentlt use NewsGator Online.  How does it compare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Humphreys</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7315</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Humphreys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 12:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7315</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review Paul... I&#039;d heard about FeedLounge a while back, but was, as others have said, put off by the price tag.  After your review, I&#039;ve given the demo a go, and I&#039;m really impressed.  Although, I won&#039;t be signing up just yet, until as you said, the feeds get updated in a more regular fashion and I see a FeedLounge notifier (ala &lt;a href=&quot;http://bloglines.com/about/notifier&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bloglines Notifier&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review Paul&#8230; I&#8217;d heard about FeedLounge a while back, but was, as others have said, put off by the price tag.  After your review, I&#8217;ve given the demo a go, and I&#8217;m really impressed.  Although, I won&#8217;t be signing up just yet, until as you said, the feeds get updated in a more regular fashion and I see a FeedLounge notifier (ala <a href="http://bloglines.com/about/notifier" rel="nofollow">Bloglines Notifier</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrono Cr@cker</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7311</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrono Cr@cker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 10:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7311</guid>
		<description>Good Review, I&#039;ve not seen this comprehensive a review on Feedlounge before. Some of my own thoughts

1) Feedlounge is really feature rich but I think none of the features in Feedlounge are truly new or innovative. Bloglines &amp; Rojo have almost everything. The RSS Reader idea has fantastic scope (http://chronotron.wordpress.com/2006/03/18/the-perfect-rss-web-based-reader/) but nobody really realised it. Bloglines did show some potential, but they&#039;ve screwed up everything now.

2) Feedlounge has a good interface and a neat left pane but I&#039;m not really a fan of their email client like interface. Some kinda interfaces are suitable only for some things.

3) The price is a bit pinchy! 

Otherwise it is pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Review, I&#8217;ve not seen this comprehensive a review on Feedlounge before. Some of my own thoughts</p>
<p>1) Feedlounge is really feature rich but I think none of the features in Feedlounge are truly new or innovative. Bloglines &amp; Rojo have almost everything. The RSS Reader idea has fantastic scope (<a href="http://chronotron.wordpress.com/2006/03/18/the-perfect-rss-web-based-reader/" rel="nofollow">http://chronotron.wordpress.com/2006/03/18/the-perfect-rss-web-based-reader/</a>) but nobody really realised it. Bloglines did show some potential, but they&#8217;ve screwed up everything now.</p>
<p>2) Feedlounge has a good interface and a neat left pane but I&#8217;m not really a fan of their email client like interface. Some kinda interfaces are suitable only for some things.</p>
<p>3) The price is a bit pinchy! </p>
<p>Otherwise it is pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyn Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7244</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyn Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 06:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7244</guid>
		<description>Nice article Paul. I&#039;ve been testing out several RSS Aggregators and finally settled on Rojo a few weeks ago. It just seemed faster, better looking and I liked the tagging and Mojo features. I&#039;ve heard about FeedLounge but shyed away from it because it comes with a price tag, but after reading your article, I decided to try the demo. I&#039;m glad I did. Feedlounge is a very nice aggregator and feel it&#039;s worth the $45/ year price...I&#039;ll be signing up soon.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Paul. I&#8217;ve been testing out several RSS Aggregators and finally settled on Rojo a few weeks ago. It just seemed faster, better looking and I liked the tagging and Mojo features. I&#8217;ve heard about FeedLounge but shyed away from it because it comes with a price tag, but after reading your article, I decided to try the demo. I&#8217;m glad I did. Feedlounge is a very nice aggregator and feel it&#8217;s worth the $45/ year price&#8230;I&#8217;ll be signing up soon.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Anthony</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/review-feedlounge#comment-7200</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 05:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/05/20/review-feedlounge/#comment-7200</guid>
		<description>Paul, that is a great review. Thanks man. I agree, some may be turned off by a PayPal only option. I&#039;m surprised the payment option is so limited, after a year. Hmmm ... I&#039;m using FeedDemon right now, but I may look into switching now, thanks to your thorough review. Keep up the great writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, that is a great review. Thanks man. I agree, some may be turned off by a PayPal only option. I&#8217;m surprised the payment option is so limited, after a year. Hmmm &#8230; I&#8217;m using FeedDemon right now, but I may look into switching now, thanks to your thorough review. Keep up the great writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
