Review: FeedLounge

May 20, 2006 · 19 comments

Bloggers, techies, professional journalists and college students all seem to share one thing in common. They love staying in-the-know. Roommates talking about the new Nintendo Wii? No problem, RSS aggregators can help you out by allowing you to subscribe to many video game sites, per this scenario, and get informed so you won’t have to ride in the back seat. There are many RSS readers or aggregators out there, but which one do I use you ask? I use FeedLounge, a project started by contributing WordPress developer Alex King.

The Features

FeedLounge is not an application; it’s an online web service which you subscribe to. Since it is online, I can have access to my feeds from any computer, whether it be in my room on my desktop computer, my laptop while lounging in the student center or the library computers. I know what you’re saying. Bloglines, NewsGator, NewsAlloy, Rojo and other services offer the same thing for free. Not quite. FeedLounge provides each user with a great and productive experience in many ways.

Impressive Interface

After trying the demo a few months ago, I was instantly attracted to the slick, AJAX-ified interface. No need to refresh the page to see new items, they just appear. FeedLounge keeps track of your history, so if you know you read something interesting yesterday but forgot what it was, you can quickly click the history icon to find that particular post. FeedLounge was built upon the principle that its users will be tracking many feeds at the same time, therefore it must be easy for them to find what they need. Users can also sort posts by tags, which can easily be added manually to each post. When you subscribe to feeds, you are given the option of tagging them, which groups feeds with the same tags. You can also change the color of each tag which is rather helpful for people tracking over a hundred feeds split into many tags.

Despite using AJAX, which has gained a bad reputation among slow interfaces such as Yahoo Mail Beta, FeedLounge is rather snappy. The first time you load it on a computer it will take a few seconds to download and cache the necessary files, but after that it is immensely responsive. On my internet connection, clicking a feed displays a list of posts in under a second and clicking a post to display the article is equally impressive. However, your experience may vary.

To accomodate for everyone’s viewing preferences and varying display resolutions, FeedLounge comes equipped with three viewing modes that are accessible with layout icons along the top of the page. In addition, users can manually adjust the width and height of each portion of the page, similar to a real application like NetNewsWire. Each layout is equally intuitive and productive. Users can see everything in one screen.

FeedLounge Screenshot
The streamlined FeedLounge interface.

Navigation can be facilitated through the use of the keyboard for tagging, flagging, opening feed tags, changing layouts and scrolling through feeds.

Usability

FeedLounge comes loaded with everything you would expect a pay service to come with; feed auto-discovery so you only need to supply the site’s URL and FeedLounge finds out the rest, cross-browser support so FeedLounge looks and works great regardless of your browser, and feed validation. Feeds that require 401 authentication can also be used, no problem. However, there are some features you might not have expected. Users can not only import and export their feed list with OPML, but also flag posts similar to how emails can be starred in Gmail. If you have a del.icio.us account you can set FeedLounge up to automotically tag posts on your del.icio.us account that you have tagged from within FeedLounge.

FeedLounge Screenshot
The settings window.

However, I must say that the coolest feature is Tag/Search Feeds. Found on the third tab in the add a feed window (which is powered by Lightbox-like JavaScript effects), this feature lets you subscribe to dynamic feeds created based upon tags or search queries you provide. FeedLounge currently provides this feature for del.icio.us, Flickr, Technorati, eBay, DayPop, Feedster, Google Blog Search, IceRocket and Yahoo News.

FeedLounge Screenshot
The Add Feeds dialogue.

Community

Unlike most online feed aggregators, FeedLounge has an API allowing developers to link into the powerful service. FeedLounge also hosts a lively forum where users can ask questions, get answers and even request features. In fact, there is a voting page that allows FeedLounge to see what features people most want to see in the near future. The top item on this list is currently a feed/post search, with a mobile interface and displaying favicons for each feed coming in second and third. The large community has fostered the creation of user-submitted styles, Greasemonkey scripts and widgets.

Pricing

As I hinted to earlier, FeedLounge is not a free service. Monthly subscriptions go at a reasonable $5 USD per month or $49.95 USD per year. At this moment payment is only accepted via PayPal, which might deter some users right there. Going through their blog, you can see how far they have come. However, there are a few things that I think would bring FeedLounge more users.

For a pay service, one would expect the utmost reliability yet there are currently three separate posts on the FeedLounge blog homepage talking about unscheduled downtime. In addition, feeds are not updated too quickly. On average, each feed is updated somewhere between an hour to a day. Subscribing to a fast-paced blog feed can easily show the weakness in this. A digg feed will routinely be several posts out of date. Yet, this might soon be fixed as it is on the voting page discussed earlier. Until FeedLounge gets all of these things worked out and displays favicons, which Bloglines already does, I think a $3/month fee would be more reasonable.

Summary

FeedLounge provides an excellent, easy-to-use RSS-aggregating web service backed by an active community. Despite a few drawbacks, the cost of the service can easily be justified by techies and news hounds alike. Hopefully the future of FeedLounge brings more servers and more employees to make everything on the voting page happen and get it all online with speedier servers. I switched from NetNewsWire to FeedLounge and haven’t looked back since. There’s nothing like grokking in a few of my favorite feeds in the midst of class.

{ 1 trackback }

Blog of Leonid Mamchenkov » Daily del.icio.us bookmarks
May 23, 2006 at 4:25 am

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Shawn Anthony May 21, 2006 at 12:07 am

Paul, that is a great review. Thanks man. I agree, some may be turned off by a PayPal only option. I’m surprised the payment option is so limited, after a year. Hmmm … I’m using FeedDemon right now, but I may look into switching now, thanks to your thorough review. Keep up the great writing.

Reply   More from author

2 Allyn Edmonds May 21, 2006 at 1:09 am

Nice article Paul. I’ve been testing out several RSS Aggregators and finally settled on Rojo a few weeks ago. It just seemed faster, better looking and I liked the tagging and Mojo features. I’ve heard about FeedLounge but shyed away from it because it comes with a price tag, but after reading your article, I decided to try the demo. I’m glad I did. Feedlounge is a very nice aggregator and feel it’s worth the $45/ year price…I’ll be signing up soon.

Thanks!

Reply

3 Chrono Cr@cker May 21, 2006 at 5:04 am

Good Review, I’ve not seen this comprehensive a review on Feedlounge before. Some of my own thoughts

1) Feedlounge is really feature rich but I think none of the features in Feedlounge are truly new or innovative. Bloglines & Rojo have almost everything. The RSS Reader idea has fantastic scope (http://chronotron.wordpress.com/2006/03/18/the-perfect-rss-web-based-reader/) but nobody really realised it. Bloglines did show some potential, but they’ve screwed up everything now.

2) Feedlounge has a good interface and a neat left pane but I’m not really a fan of their email client like interface. Some kinda interfaces are suitable only for some things.

3) The price is a bit pinchy!

Otherwise it is pretty good.

Reply   More from author

4 Ryan Humphreys May 21, 2006 at 7:13 am

Thanks for the review Paul… I’d heard about FeedLounge a while back, but was, as others have said, put off by the price tag. After your review, I’ve given the demo a go, and I’m really impressed. Although, I won’t be signing up just yet, until as you said, the feeds get updated in a more regular fashion and I see a FeedLounge notifier (ala Bloglines Notifier).

Reply   More from author

5 Dennis Bullock May 21, 2006 at 8:11 am

I currentlt use NewsGator Online. How does it compare?

Reply   More from author

6 Kevin May 21, 2006 at 1:06 pm

Neat review Paul.

I don’t know about paying subscriptions… it’s an endless overhead no matter how good something is. I bought Netnewswire and it syncs ith Newsgator, which isn’t ajax, but works just like Netnewswire but online. They sync, and I’m happy since I can read my subscriptions, whether I’m on my machine or someone else’s. :)

Reply   More from author

7 Derek Punsalan May 21, 2006 at 5:39 pm

Great review Paul. I almost forgot that I was subscribed to the service. After I dropped the yearly fee and began using the service on a daily (almost hourly) basis, the realization that a renewal at years end totally slipped my mind. The service definitely pays for itself.

I haven’t frequented the boards in awhile but I do know that there is one feature I am yearning for… The option to search through read items rather than having to scroll through manually. With so much content coming through, I sometimes forget to flag or tag an item of interest and am forced to go through the history by hand.

Aside from that little minor detail, I would never hesitate to recommend the service to others. Alex King and the gang have a superb support group and often answer bugs or reports in the forums near quickly.

Reply   More from author

8 Alex May 21, 2006 at 11:17 pm

Nice review Paul, thanks! Just a quick FYI – for the past couple of months we’ve been quietly refreshing the feeds on a much faster schedule: refresh all feeds every 4 hours or faster (depending on post frequency) and if a feed supports sending 301 headers, we refresh it every 30 minutes regardless of the time between posts. We’re still experimenting to find the right mix and make sure we can scale it before we announce it officially.

A few other notes:

Shawn Anthony – the service has been public since mid-January this year (approximately 4 months).

Chrono Cr@cker – it’s interesting to see the difference in expectations of feed reader interfaces between folks that started on desktop readers and folks taht started on web-based readers.

Ryan Humphreys – we released our Notifier API recently, and there is already an OS X widget using it. I expect we’ll have a full suite of notifiers fairly soon.

Reply   More from author

9 Paul Stamatiou May 21, 2006 at 11:19 pm

Oops seems like I was wrong about how old FeedLounge was. I went by the first blog post. So the blog has been up about a year, FeedLounge has only been public for about 4 months. =)

Reply   More from author

10 Leonid Mamchenkov May 22, 2006 at 2:24 am

Thanks for a review. I am desperate to try it out, but it’s currently down. ;)

Reply   More from author

11 Brett May 22, 2006 at 3:42 am

I signed up for the service, it was exactly what I was looking for! But all today I have been unable to access thie site at all. Has anyone else noticed this?

Reply   More from author

12 Constantinos Kouloumbris May 22, 2006 at 4:46 am

Paul,

Thanks for the review. Do you have any inside info on why is the service down? We would like to try it out but it’s down for more than 4h. Is this a regular thing?

Reply   More from author

13 Paul Stamatiou May 22, 2006 at 4:48 am

I’ve never experienced downtime like this before. I wonder what’s up… or shall I say down. (bad pun)

Reply   More from author

14 Alex May 22, 2006 at 8:58 am

Actually, FeedLounge has been up this entire time – it’s a DNS problem causing you difficulty in getting to the site and service..

FeedLounge (the web service) is hosted in a co-lo in San Francisco, while the FeedLounge web site is hosted in a data center in New Jersey with the rest of Scott and my web sites hosted on a dedicated server in Austin, TX. Unfortunately, the box in Austin, TX was the primary DNS server for all of these and it burned up on Sunday morning (about 22 hours ago) causing the difficulty in getting to the FeedLounge web site and service.

Hopefully the DNS change has made it to you by now. If it hasn’t, please add 65.90.218.228 to your list of DNS servers in the interim so you can access FeedLounge.

Reply   More from author

15 Brett May 22, 2006 at 5:27 pm

Flushing your local DNS tables will also fix this. :) Thanks for the update Alex.

Reply   More from author

16 Chrono Cr@cker May 23, 2006 at 6:00 am

@Alex: Hmm…I really don’t get the point you were trying to convey to me. I started both Web-based and Desktop at the same time. However my friends who started to use Desk-B, have converted to some online service, thanks to the advantages.

Okay, I really went and tried feedlounge once again after writing that comment, it’s been long as I had checked out screenies quite sometime ago and this time I wanted to get more of a feel since this review had really recommended it.

I must admit, it was slick, fast and feature rich… And seriously better than Bloglines and the rest. But I’m a feed devourer and view tons and tons of headlines everyday. Feedlounge doesn’t suit me. The way of reading feeds – Like outlook express, is good but is not the way I prefer as time would be wasted a lot. I filter my posts based on headlines and thus I wanna give more space to the content.

But nevertheless, great service. Good work! I can’t really buy it as I have no online money account, but great job anyway.FL should ask for readers comments on the above reading feeds and give options to the readers as to how they can read feeds.

~ CC

Reply   More from author

17 Alex May 23, 2006 at 10:48 am

CC–

If there is one thing I’ve learned from FeedLounge, it is that people have a wide variety of reading preferences. I wanted to make sude you were aware of our three reading views:

http://feedlounge.com/support/tutorial/read/

I personally use a similar approach to the one you describe. I use the 3 column view (the second option in FeedLounge) to do so.

The list of items allows me to read the item title and the source, then I click or arrow key to the ones I’m interested in and read them in the viewpane.

To expand on previous comment regarding people’s first feed reading experience, it’s again born from the feedback we’ve received from FeedLounge users. The users that were previously NetNewsWire or FeedDemon users love FeedLounge’s 3 pane interfaces – they love being able to have “the power of a desktop interface on the web.” Conversely, folks who are longtime Bloglines users eschew both of these views in favor of the River of News view – and they consistently ask us to make the reading experience more like the experience Bloglines offers.

Now of course these are sweeping generalizations and there are exceptions, but the above if true in the 80+% case. The diversity certainly makes things interesting.

Reply   More from author

18 Brett May 24, 2006 at 2:43 am

Alex

Is there a limit on the humber of feeds that you can assign to a specific tag? I have some that I cannot edit no matter how many times I click on info and add a tag. Just curious, as I like to organize things in collapsable groups. Great job at any rate! :D

Reply   More from author

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post: Video: Upgrade RAM and Hard Drive in MacBook

Next post: MacBook Too Hot to Handle… Literally