<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Being a Website Performance Junkie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie</link>
	<description>Tech News, Reviews and Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:18:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scaling WordPress</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-170872</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaling WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-170872</guid>
		<description>[...] improvements far outweigh the compatibility issues that may arise. If you&#8217;re a real performance junkie you may be interested in a simple hack to enable gzip with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] improvements far outweigh the compatibility issues that may arise. If you&#8217;re a real performance junkie you may be interested in a simple hack to enable gzip with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaling WordPress&#160;&#124;&#160;infopal - palestina</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-170169</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaling WordPress&#160;&#124;&#160;infopal - palestina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-170169</guid>
		<description>[...] improvements far outweigh the compatibility issues that may arise. If you&#8217;re a real performance junkie you may be interested in a simple hack to enable gzip with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] improvements far outweigh the compatibility issues that may arise. If you&#8217;re a real performance junkie you may be interested in a simple hack to enable gzip with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedmaster</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-148740</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-148740</guid>
		<description>Great stuff. I do performance testing of web sites for a living.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff. I do performance testing of web sites for a living.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moved To BlueHost Media Temple Grid Server Overrated</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-142254</link>
		<dc:creator>Moved To BlueHost Media Temple Grid Server Overrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-142254</guid>
		<description>[...] important) response time for the sites they hosted over MT. In fact I even commented on this on paul stamatiou&#8217;s blog 2 months back and wanted to do a blog post about it but never got down to doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] important) response time for the sites they hosted over MT. In fact I even commented on this on paul stamatiou&#8217;s blog 2 months back and wanted to do a blog post about it but never got down to doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaling WordPress - I&#8217;m Mike</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-133709</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaling WordPress - I&#8217;m Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-133709</guid>
		<description>[...] improvements far outweigh the compatibility issues that may arise. If you&#8217;re a real performance junkie you may be interested in a simple hack to enable gzip with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] improvements far outweigh the compatibility issues that may arise. If you&#8217;re a real performance junkie you may be interested in a simple hack to enable gzip with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Backup Tools &#124; Keener Living</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-132379</link>
		<dc:creator>My Backup Tools &#124; Keener Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-132379</guid>
		<description>[...] Setting up an S3 account was easy. Learning how to use it took a bit of effort. My starting point was some of super-geek Paul Stamatiou&#8217;s material, starting with his how-to on being a website performance junkie. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Setting up an S3 account was easy. Learning how to use it took a bit of effort. My starting point was some of super-geek Paul Stamatiou&#8217;s material, starting with his how-to on being a website performance junkie. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uber blog performance - pestaola.gr</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-132267</link>
		<dc:creator>Uber blog performance - pestaola.gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-132267</guid>
		<description>[...] Junkie or speaking for myself, a Wordpress Performance Junkie Blogger. One of his latest posts, On Being a Website Performance Junkie got me thinking. As i&#8217;m new to Amazon S3 i got excited from the idea of moving files like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Junkie or speaking for myself, a Wordpress Performance Junkie Blogger. One of his latest posts, On Being a Website Performance Junkie got me thinking. As i&#8217;m new to Amazon S3 i got excited from the idea of moving files like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oskar Ã¶berg &#124; SkÃ¶na och snygga knappar fÃ¶r formulÃ¤ret</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-131711</link>
		<dc:creator>oskar Ã¶berg &#124; SkÃ¶na och snygga knappar fÃ¶r formulÃ¤ret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-131711</guid>
		<description>[...] Hur gÃ¶r man dÃ¥ en riktigt smart &#8220;tree-state-button&#8221;? Att byta bilder pÃ¥ saker och ting dynamiskt med CSS eller JavaScript medfÃ¶r nÃ¥gra problem. NÃ¤r man t.ex. fÃ¶r musen Ã¶ver knappen fÃ¶rsta gÃ¥ngen kommer bilden fÃ¶r &#8220;hover&#8221;-lÃ¤get behÃ¶va hÃ¤mtas och det blir en fÃ¶rdrÃ¶jning. Detsamma gÃ¤ller nÃ¤r man klickar pÃ¥ knappen. Klickar man fÃ¶r fort hinner man aldrig ens se knappens nedtryckta lÃ¤ge. Detta gÃ¥r fÃ¶rstÃ¥s att komma undan genom att man fÃ¶rladdar knappens tre bilder. Detta innebÃ¤r dock tvÃ¥ onÃ¶diga HttpRequests, vilket Ã¤r en stor smÃ¤rta fÃ¶r den Ã¤kta &#8220;Percormance Junkien&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hur gÃ¶r man dÃ¥ en riktigt smart &#8220;tree-state-button&#8221;? Att byta bilder pÃ¥ saker och ting dynamiskt med CSS eller JavaScript medfÃ¶r nÃ¥gra problem. NÃ¤r man t.ex. fÃ¶r musen Ã¶ver knappen fÃ¶rsta gÃ¥ngen kommer bilden fÃ¶r &#8220;hover&#8221;-lÃ¤get behÃ¶va hÃ¤mtas och det blir en fÃ¶rdrÃ¶jning. Detsamma gÃ¤ller nÃ¤r man klickar pÃ¥ knappen. Klickar man fÃ¶r fort hinner man aldrig ens se knappens nedtryckta lÃ¤ge. Detta gÃ¥r fÃ¶rstÃ¥s att komma undan genom att man fÃ¶rladdar knappens tre bilder. Detta innebÃ¤r dock tvÃ¥ onÃ¶diga HttpRequests, vilket Ã¤r en stor smÃ¤rta fÃ¶r den Ã¤kta &#8220;Percormance Junkien&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-07-23 : Greg Palmer</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129532</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-07-23 : Greg Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129532</guid>
		<description>[...] On Being a Website Performance Junkie - PaulStamatiou.com Interesting stuff. I&#8217;m not quite this obsessive, but I probably should be. (tags: webdev) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Being a Website Performance Junkie &#8211; PaulStamatiou.com Interesting stuff. I&#8217;m not quite this obsessive, but I probably should be. (tags: webdev) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129528</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129528</guid>
		<description>Very informative, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ashbaugh</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129487</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ashbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129487</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve notice my site load times slow down a little when I have Google Analytics running. I decided to take it out just for that reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve notice my site load times slow down a little when I have Google Analytics running. I decided to take it out just for that reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astorg</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129439</link>
		<dc:creator>Astorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129439</guid>
		<description>I switched all my sites stats from Mint to Performancing Metrics (http://pmetrics.performancing.com/) a few weeks ago and am very pleased with it, as it has tons of features that neither Mint nor Google Analytics (which I also tried but didn&#039;t like) have.

The only problem I have, which I haven&#039;t solved is that I have been using Mint for two years, and all the historical data for visitors is only recorded with Mint.  So unless I can transfer the data to my new monitoring system, I have to keep both running at the same time or no longer have comprehensive up-to-date historical stats.

Has anyone found a solution to this irritating problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched all my sites stats from Mint to Performancing Metrics (<a href="http://pmetrics.performancing.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pmetrics.performancing.com/</a>) a few weeks ago and am very pleased with it, as it has tons of features that neither Mint nor Google Analytics (which I also tried but didn&#8217;t like) have.</p>
<p>The only problem I have, which I haven&#8217;t solved is that I have been using Mint for two years, and all the historical data for visitors is only recorded with Mint.  So unless I can transfer the data to my new monitoring system, I have to keep both running at the same time or no longer have comprehensive up-to-date historical stats.</p>
<p>Has anyone found a solution to this irritating problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129438</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129438</guid>
		<description>For my latest work in progress site, bandwidth is a problem. Now I am thinking about getting a S3 account. I am just worried I&#039;ll use so much bandwidth that I end up paying more because of S3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my latest work in progress site, bandwidth is a problem. Now I am thinking about getting a S3 account. I am just worried I&#8217;ll use so much bandwidth that I end up paying more because of S3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129372</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129372</guid>
		<description>Great write up, really useful.
You seem to have good experience on web stat tools.
I have been using &lt;a href=&quot;http://gostats.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GoStats.com&lt;/a&gt; , they provide a log size of 1000 visitors, have u used any tool with a greater log size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up, really useful.<br />
You seem to have good experience on web stat tools.<br />
I have been using <a href="http://gostats.com" rel="nofollow">GoStats.com</a> , they provide a log size of 1000 visitors, have u used any tool with a greater log size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Goodlatte</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129352</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Goodlatte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129352</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been running WP Cache on my site for awhile, and I&#039;ve never had any problem with comments showing up.  If for whatever reason the caches aren&#039;t clearing on-comment, you can just tell WP-Cache not to cache article pages.

You might also look into writing a simple little caching php script using output buffers.  I made something like that before I started using WP cache, and i just modified the comment submit handler to also clear the caching system i wrote.

Finally, what about stored MySQL procedures?  If you&#039;re running the same queries for populating the homepage, archives, etc you might be able to shave a few ms using stored procs.

Great writeup, I learned quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running WP Cache on my site for awhile, and I&#8217;ve never had any problem with comments showing up.  If for whatever reason the caches aren&#8217;t clearing on-comment, you can just tell WP-Cache not to cache article pages.</p>
<p>You might also look into writing a simple little caching php script using output buffers.  I made something like that before I started using WP cache, and i just modified the comment submit handler to also clear the caching system i wrote.</p>
<p>Finally, what about stored MySQL procedures?  If you&#8217;re running the same queries for populating the homepage, archives, etc you might be able to shave a few ms using stored procs.</p>
<p>Great writeup, I learned quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arghyle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick Update</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129348</link>
		<dc:creator>arghyle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129348</guid>
		<description>[...] Stamatiou on improving web site performance with S3. - nothing too new here, but he does a nice job of explaining [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stamatiou on improving web site performance with S3. &#8211; nothing too new here, but he does a nice job of explaining [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Keener</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129346</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Keener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129346</guid>
		<description>OK folks, as a noob to this stuff, you have really gotten my interest up.

How does one go about measuring these times that you are talking about? I&#039;d like to see what factors are influencing my loading. I use bluehost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK folks, as a noob to this stuff, you have really gotten my interest up.</p>
<p>How does one go about measuring these times that you are talking about? I&#8217;d like to see what factors are influencing my loading. I use bluehost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Schiller</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129329</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129329</guid>
		<description>Also related are domain name limitations (ie., simultaneous downloads from the same domain - varies per browser), and future &quot;expires&quot; headers for caching (eg. a file which is valid until 2010 should be aggressively cached.) Y! has published a few articles via the YUI blog on performance, recommended reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also related are domain name limitations (ie., simultaneous downloads from the same domain &#8211; varies per browser), and future &#8220;expires&#8221; headers for caching (eg. a file which is valid until 2010 should be aggressively cached.) Y! has published a few articles via the YUI blog on performance, recommended reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Ricketts</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Ricketts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129323</guid>
		<description>Just yesterday the company I work for found some problems with IE6.0&#039;s support of gzip.  Probably not much of a concern here as I doubt many people are running IE6 when coming to this site (and a non-updated versions of IE6 at that!).  Something to consider.  Maybe.

Side note: This post was killer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just yesterday the company I work for found some problems with IE6.0&#8217;s support of gzip.  Probably not much of a concern here as I doubt many people are running IE6 when coming to this site (and a non-updated versions of IE6 at that!).  Something to consider.  Maybe.</p>
<p>Side note: This post was killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Brannon</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129312</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Brannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129312</guid>
		<description>Nice post!  I never thought of removing the comments from CSS to speed up load time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post!  I never thought of removing the comments from CSS to speed up load time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129311</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129311</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;PHP is so much faster that MySQL in processing time that it is fairly negligible, however it is always good to bypass extra code right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not always (is PHP so much faster than MySQL).  In fact, since WordPress 2.1 and up have posts queries that remain static (&lt;code&gt;WHERE post_status=&#039;publish&#039;&lt;/code&gt; as opposed to the old &lt;code&gt;WHERE post_date_gmt ), hosts who enable MySQL qcache will probably make PHP the bottleneck.

For instance, on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://txfx.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;personal blog&lt;/a&gt;, I just got &quot;Dynamic: 0.329 seconds &#124; 10 queries (0.050 seconds)&quot; -- so MySQL is only 13% of the page generation time.

Things that can really kill you are (a) showing all your categories in the sidebar (particularly if you have a huge category tree), (b) listing recent posts (in a non-cached way), (c) poorly coded plugins that do a lot of pushups on every load when they could cache stuff and update when the info changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>PHP is so much faster that MySQL in processing time that it is fairly negligible, however it is always good to bypass extra code right?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not always (is PHP so much faster than MySQL).  In fact, since WordPress 2.1 and up have posts queries that remain static (<code>WHERE post_status='publish'</code> as opposed to the old <code>WHERE post_date_gmt ), hosts who enable MySQL qcache will probably make PHP the bottleneck.</p>
<p>For instance, on my <a href="http://txfx.net/" rel="nofollow">personal blog</a>, I just got "Dynamic: 0.329 seconds | 10 queries (0.050 seconds)" -- so MySQL is only 13% of the page generation time.</p>
<p>Things that can really kill you are (a) showing all your categories in the sidebar (particularly if you have a huge category tree), (b) listing recent posts (in a non-cached way), (c) poorly coded plugins that do a lot of pushups on every load when they could cache stuff and update when the info changes.</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sea</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129310</link>
		<dc:creator>Sea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129310</guid>
		<description>Do you mind telling us how much your s3 bill is for hosting those small images?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mind telling us how much your s3 bill is for hosting those small images?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129296</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129296</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to be so blunt about it. On smaller sites, Mint is great in terms of features and live stats reporting, it just doesn&#039;t appear to scale well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to be so blunt about it. On smaller sites, Mint is great in terms of features and live stats reporting, it just doesn&#8217;t appear to scale well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PilotJohn</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129295</link>
		<dc:creator>PilotJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129295</guid>
		<description>Excellent article Paul...i find it interesting in the mint/google analytics speed...i just installed mint on my site and find it a lot more user friendly than the google analytics. It is still crazy it causes that much delay than google that is off your server...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article Paul&#8230;i find it interesting in the mint/google analytics speed&#8230;i just installed mint on my site and find it a lot more user friendly than the google analytics. It is still crazy it causes that much delay than google that is off your server&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie#comment-129291</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/07/17/on-being-a-website-performance-junkie/#comment-129291</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, I&#039;ll try to put some static content on S3. We use it a lot for our Web-apps, but never thought about putting static files there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, I&#8217;ll try to put some static content on S3. We use it a lot for our Web-apps, but never thought about putting static files there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
