<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPod Nanos Scratchproof!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof</link>
	<description>Tech News, Reviews and Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leix</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-11672</link>
		<dc:creator>leix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-11672</guid>
		<description>well, as for the scratches, i think it&#039;s good to buy the invisible shield for nanos from shieldzone. haven&#039;t tried it, but could be good.. watch video.

http://www.shieldzone.com/item_description/APL6090.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, as for the scratches, i think it&#8217;s good to buy the invisible shield for nanos from shieldzone. haven&#8217;t tried it, but could be good.. watch video.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shieldzone.com/item_description/APL6090.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.shieldzone.com/item_description/APL6090.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>@Ka-Meng: Great link - just sucks that we they don&#039;t yet have small wireless earbuds (yes, of course you&#039;d lose them, but that would only make them more money) - because the wire really takes away from the whole design aspect, especially of the belt buckle! Oh, and i&#039;m not sure how comfortable wearing a big leather belt to the gym is ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ka-Meng: Great link &#8211; just sucks that we they don&#8217;t yet have small wireless earbuds (yes, of course you&#8217;d lose them, but that would only make them more money) &#8211; because the wire really takes away from the whole design aspect, especially of the belt buckle! Oh, and i&#8217;m not sure how comfortable wearing a big leather belt to the gym is ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ka-Meng</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ka-Meng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>@Eli: Why the need for a belt clip, when it can be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tunebuckle.com/&quot;&gt;belt buckle&lt;/a&gt; itself? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eli: Why the need for a belt clip, when it can be the <a href="http://www.tunebuckle.com/">belt buckle</a> itself? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantinos</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantinos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>iLounge &lt;a href=&quot;http://portableaudio.engadget.com/2006/02/12/new-nanos-get-raised-edges-for-scratch-protection/&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; it&#039;s: &quot;either a fraud, a manufacturing oddity in some subset of units, or something that does not exist in the brand new 1GB unit we have here&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iLounge <a href="http://portableaudio.engadget.com/2006/02/12/new-nanos-get-raised-edges-for-scratch-protection/">says</a> it&#8217;s: &#8220;either a fraud, a manufacturing oddity in some subset of units, or something that does not exist in the brand new 1GB unit we have here&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2640</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2640</guid>
		<description>Not only does the Nano get scratched easily, it lacks a belt clip, too. Solving both problems is this solution by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c6mfg.com/index.html&quot;&gt;c6 Mfg.&lt;/a&gt; which is cheap, stylish and functional!

As usual, the articles are great, Paul - hope you feel better soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does the Nano get scratched easily, it lacks a belt clip, too. Solving both problems is this solution by <a href="http://www.c6mfg.com/index.html">c6 Mfg.</a> which is cheap, stylish and functional!</p>
<p>As usual, the articles are great, Paul &#8211; hope you feel better soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>I could be wrong, but what I gather is that is a picture of a Nano with the PowerSupport Crystal film on it, showing how the new anti-scratch edge is causing it to not adhere to the iPod&#039;s face.

The PS Crystal film uses static to stick to the iPod, so that&#039;s why the little extrusion affects it negatively.

I wouldn&#039;t call it &quot;scratchproof&quot; yet, we&#039;re still a long way from that. Maybe &quot;slightly less like a scratch magnet than previously&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong, but what I gather is that is a picture of a Nano with the PowerSupport Crystal film on it, showing how the new anti-scratch edge is causing it to not adhere to the iPod&#8217;s face.</p>
<p>The PS Crystal film uses static to stick to the iPod, so that&#8217;s why the little extrusion affects it negatively.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call it &#8220;scratchproof&#8221; yet, we&#8217;re still a long way from that. Maybe &#8220;slightly less like a scratch magnet than previously&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>I agree Ron.  As Devin said, my keys will still demolish the surface regardless.  Apple never thought that I would have keys in the same pocket as my iPod huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Ron.  As Devin said, my keys will still demolish the surface regardless.  Apple never thought that I would have keys in the same pocket as my iPod huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cavemonkey50</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>cavemonkey50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2634</guid>
		<description>Unless Apple changed the outer material, this is a pointless update. An indent isn&#039;t going to do much at all. When you place a Nano in a pocket, the pocket will run against the nano regardless of how deep the indent is. Besides, the indent looks just plain stupid. It takes away the sleekness of the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Apple changed the outer material, this is a pointless update. An indent isn&#8217;t going to do much at all. When you place a Nano in a pocket, the pocket will run against the nano regardless of how deep the indent is. Besides, the indent looks just plain stupid. It takes away the sleekness of the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulstamatiou.com/2006/02/11/new-ipod-nanos-scratchproof/#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>The flu? No fun at all... take it easy. 

The design change is interesting, though... too bad the bevel won&#039;t stop those keys in my pocket. Thank goodness for &lt;a href=&quot;http://todd.dailey.info/archives/2005/09/27/restore-your-ipod-nano-to-new-condition-with-a-4-can-of-brasso/&quot;&gt;Brasso&lt;/a&gt;.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flu? No fun at all&#8230; take it easy. </p>
<p>The design change is interesting, though&#8230; too bad the bevel won&#8217;t stop those keys in my pocket. Thank goodness for <a href="http://todd.dailey.info/archives/2005/09/27/restore-your-ipod-nano-to-new-condition-with-a-4-can-of-brasso/">Brasso</a>.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
