<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make This Startup: HD Video Serving Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service</link>
	<description>Tech News, Reviews and Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:43:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kischuk</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-153227</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kischuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-153227</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a valid concept that is only just now becoming feasible.  I would wonder if a plan could be put together targeting a niche with a free offering to keep the offering focused, increase the CPM of any ads if ad-supported, and fend off competition from any of the big boys just upping their resolution.

I&#039;m not so sure of the AWS route - you already mention that it would need to scale early, and that bandwidth costs would be an issue.  For all of its benefits, AWS pricing would chew through dollars much faster than comparable capacity at a colo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a valid concept that is only just now becoming feasible.  I would wonder if a plan could be put together targeting a niche with a free offering to keep the offering focused, increase the CPM of any ads if ad-supported, and fend off competition from any of the big boys just upping their resolution.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure of the AWS route &#8211; you already mention that it would need to scale early, and that bandwidth costs would be an issue.  For all of its benefits, AWS pricing would chew through dollars much faster than comparable capacity at a colo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-152460</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-152460</guid>
		<description>This might be what you are looking for: http://www.ooyala.com/

They were the winner of the Amazon Web Services challenge: http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi%2dcontent=NEWS%5fVIEW%5fPOPUP%5fTYPE&amp;newsId=20071206006270&amp;ndmHsc=v2%2aA1196946000000%2aB1197040954000%2aDgroupByDate%2aJ2%2aN1000837&amp;newsLang=en&amp;beanID=202776713&amp;viewID=news%5fview%5fpopup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be what you are looking for: <a href="http://www.ooyala.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ooyala.com/</a></p>
<p>They were the winner of the Amazon Web Services challenge: <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi%2dcontent=NEWS%5fVIEW%5fPOPUP%5fTYPE&amp;newsId=20071206006270&amp;ndmHsc=v2%2aA1196946000000%2aB1197040954000%2aDgroupByDate%2aJ2%2aN1000837&amp;newsLang=en&amp;beanID=202776713&amp;viewID=news%5fview%5fpopup" rel="nofollow">http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi%2dcontent=NEWS%5fVIEW%5fPOPUP%5fTYPE&amp;newsId=20071206006270&amp;ndmHsc=v2%2aA1196946000000%2aB1197040954000%2aDgroupByDate%2aJ2%2aN1000837&amp;newsLang=en&amp;beanID=202776713&amp;viewID=news%5fview%5fpopup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Harris</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-152139</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-152139</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the link is http://stageps3.com/ not www.ps3stage.com

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the link is <a href="http://stageps3.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stageps3.com/</a> not <a href="http://www.ps3stage.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ps3stage.com</a></p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Harris</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-152138</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-152138</guid>
		<description>Paul, 

Nice post. I have been working on a similar idea for the past 8 months. Just last night (here in Atlanta) I had a similar conversation with the guys at  Konsole Kingz (see: www.konsolekingz.com) about a start-up HD distribution platform. They have a deal with MSFT and the the Xbox team - they produce most of the urban HD content on the Xbox Live network.

In our conversation we agreed that:

1) There are enough HD box (i.e. Sony PS3s, Xbox 360s and Tivo HDs, etc.) in the world to support a low overhead startup. 

2) Openness of these boxes is key - I think that Sony has the right idea - having a browser on the box. If they would only implement the same RSS reader on the PS3 that is found on the PSP, the world would be a much better place for HD content.

3) There is a ton of content already in the wild that simply needs to be converted to the proper format, wrapped in a little meta data and published in a user friendly way. For proof, head over to the iTunes podcast directory and peep out the growing amount of HD content. There are also dozens of content start-ups that are producing wonderful HD - think MariposaHD - It&#039;s so well done that it almost drove me to buy a new PC just to watch it.

4) In the end, RSS is everything and Torrents might be a waste of time. The ability to subscribe to content, and have a slow, direct download, is much better than hunting for something interesting (think Pirates Bay, Vuze and Stage6) and waiting for the peers to feed you. This is why the iTunes podcast directory is so popular globally. If this were not the case Vuze would be the answer - trust me it&#039;s not.

In the end a graceful directory, workable publishing standards and amazing content will win out over any other (YouTube like) model.

Sites to sample:

www.ps3stage.com - example of a Stage6 hack that proves how painful a &quot;wack&quot; directory and user experience can be. Great way to find HD Divx content for the PS3 if you have time to hunt and peck.

www.MariposaHD.com - one of the best of broadband HD content. howerver, they are at the mercy of the torrent crowds sadly.

http://www.konsolekingz.com/blog/ - doing a great job in focusing on their niche, and MSFT has brought them an international audience via their very closed Xbox Live network.

Paul, if you would like to talk about this in person hit my up at jharris9999 at gmail.com. I might even have a few bucks to toss into the pot.

All the best and happy New Year,

James Harris
CEO and Chief Storyteller
Elemental Interactive / ListenShare
Atlanta, Ga</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, </p>
<p>Nice post. I have been working on a similar idea for the past 8 months. Just last night (here in Atlanta) I had a similar conversation with the guys at  Konsole Kingz (see: <a href="http://www.konsolekingz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.konsolekingz.com</a>) about a start-up HD distribution platform. They have a deal with MSFT and the the Xbox team &#8211; they produce most of the urban HD content on the Xbox Live network.</p>
<p>In our conversation we agreed that:</p>
<p>1) There are enough HD box (i.e. Sony PS3s, Xbox 360s and Tivo HDs, etc.) in the world to support a low overhead startup. </p>
<p>2) Openness of these boxes is key &#8211; I think that Sony has the right idea &#8211; having a browser on the box. If they would only implement the same RSS reader on the PS3 that is found on the PSP, the world would be a much better place for HD content.</p>
<p>3) There is a ton of content already in the wild that simply needs to be converted to the proper format, wrapped in a little meta data and published in a user friendly way. For proof, head over to the iTunes podcast directory and peep out the growing amount of HD content. There are also dozens of content start-ups that are producing wonderful HD &#8211; think MariposaHD &#8211; It&#8217;s so well done that it almost drove me to buy a new PC just to watch it.</p>
<p>4) In the end, RSS is everything and Torrents might be a waste of time. The ability to subscribe to content, and have a slow, direct download, is much better than hunting for something interesting (think Pirates Bay, Vuze and Stage6) and waiting for the peers to feed you. This is why the iTunes podcast directory is so popular globally. If this were not the case Vuze would be the answer &#8211; trust me it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>In the end a graceful directory, workable publishing standards and amazing content will win out over any other (YouTube like) model.</p>
<p>Sites to sample:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ps3stage.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ps3stage.com</a> &#8211; example of a Stage6 hack that proves how painful a &#8220;wack&#8221; directory and user experience can be. Great way to find HD Divx content for the PS3 if you have time to hunt and peck.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.MariposaHD.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MariposaHD.com</a> &#8211; one of the best of broadband HD content. howerver, they are at the mercy of the torrent crowds sadly.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.konsolekingz.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.konsolekingz.com/blog/</a> &#8211; doing a great job in focusing on their niche, and MSFT has brought them an international audience via their very closed Xbox Live network.</p>
<p>Paul, if you would like to talk about this in person hit my up at jharris9999 at gmail.com. I might even have a few bucks to toss into the pot.</p>
<p>All the best and happy New Year,</p>
<p>James Harris<br />
CEO and Chief Storyteller<br />
Elemental Interactive / ListenShare<br />
Atlanta, Ga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-152082</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-152082</guid>
		<description>I think Vimeo use Amazon S3 as it happens.  My question, is it really necessary to embed video?  Personally I have no problem clicking through to Vimeo / Youtube to watch a video.  The Vimeo limits on videos (time and size), are terribly annoying, its not really suitable for anything other than sort clips- not high res dramas and documentaries.  The issues with aspect ratios are enough to drive me away.

That said, personally I like the Quicktime delivery method on onegoodmove.org, having the option to download right there on the page but on anything other than the Mac at home, (read: work computers), Quicktime is a pain to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Vimeo use Amazon S3 as it happens.  My question, is it really necessary to embed video?  Personally I have no problem clicking through to Vimeo / Youtube to watch a video.  The Vimeo limits on videos (time and size), are terribly annoying, its not really suitable for anything other than sort clips- not high res dramas and documentaries.  The issues with aspect ratios are enough to drive me away.</p>
<p>That said, personally I like the Quicktime delivery method on onegoodmove.org, having the option to download right there on the page but on anything other than the Mac at home, (read: work computers), Quicktime is a pain to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-152008</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-152008</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;ll have to make a specialty service for this. ;) I would consider making such a startup but, I wouldn&#039;t know how big the audience would be. I wonder how many other people are looking for this kind of service. Also rates would get really complicated; If I had a $10 per month flat rate for unlimited bandwidth, I may make a killing or spend  fortune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;ll have to make a specialty service for this. ;) I would consider making such a startup but, I wouldn&#8217;t know how big the audience would be. I wonder how many other people are looking for this kind of service. Also rates would get really complicated; If I had a $10 per month flat rate for unlimited bandwidth, I may make a killing or spend  fortune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151987</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151987</guid>
		<description>Millions of people already have DivX installed. And the DivX Web Player is nice if you want to give people the option to progressively download, which means they can keep the file on their computer once they have finished playing it, or more precisely buffering it. Since they can set the default directory where all the DivX files should be saved to.

Stage6 sometimes is a bit unreliable, and it can be slow to have ones videos activated on it by its browser based upload feature.

Also bandwidth from Stage6 sometimes is not fast enough for HD content, especially to Europe, at least as far as I have tested it. So it&#039;s just fine for DVD quality, but for HD quality sometimes it looks like the bandwidth provided is not fast enough. DivX says they have 10 million visitors per month on Stage6, so they must be using huge amounts of bandwidth, which can explain some of the occasionnal downtime or slow activation of new uploaded videos. But certainly the quality is better than anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of people already have DivX installed. And the DivX Web Player is nice if you want to give people the option to progressively download, which means they can keep the file on their computer once they have finished playing it, or more precisely buffering it. Since they can set the default directory where all the DivX files should be saved to.</p>
<p>Stage6 sometimes is a bit unreliable, and it can be slow to have ones videos activated on it by its browser based upload feature.</p>
<p>Also bandwidth from Stage6 sometimes is not fast enough for HD content, especially to Europe, at least as far as I have tested it. So it&#8217;s just fine for DVD quality, but for HD quality sometimes it looks like the bandwidth provided is not fast enough. DivX says they have 10 million visitors per month on Stage6, so they must be using huge amounts of bandwidth, which can explain some of the occasionnal downtime or slow activation of new uploaded videos. But certainly the quality is better than anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151986</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 05:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151986</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out Stage6 Anthony. Unfortunately it uses the DivX player which is another thing people will have to install, where as Flash is already on most computers. Regardless, I made an account and am testing it out - but to me it&#039;s just another file conversion I must make on my end before uploading. MTS &gt; MOV &gt; DivX AVI. I just uploaded a 4 second clip and it&#039;s been 20 minutes and hasn&#039;t shown up yet. I think I&#039;ll continue my search for a service similar to the one outlined in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out Stage6 Anthony. Unfortunately it uses the DivX player which is another thing people will have to install, where as Flash is already on most computers. Regardless, I made an account and am testing it out &#8211; but to me it&#8217;s just another file conversion I must make on my end before uploading. MTS > MOV > DivX AVI. I just uploaded a 4 second clip and it&#8217;s been 20 minutes and hasn&#8217;t shown up yet. I think I&#8217;ll continue my search for a service similar to the one outlined in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stabani</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151984</link>
		<dc:creator>stabani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 05:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151984</guid>
		<description>another one up for stage6.com, though you need the DivX Web Player. I kinda prefer it over most flash-based viewers any day. (stage6.com is owned by DivX)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another one up for stage6.com, though you need the DivX Web Player. I kinda prefer it over most flash-based viewers any day. (stage6.com is owned by DivX)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151981</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151981</guid>
		<description>Someone beat you Paul. Stage6.com allows you to upload and embed high-def videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone beat you Paul. Stage6.com allows you to upload and embed high-def videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151980</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 02:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151980</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been video-blogging in HD since September 2005 at http://techvideoblog.com

I&#039;ve been posting my 500 HD videos in 1280x720 DivX 3.5mbit/s. 95% of computer screens support 720p and it looks great on those.

I think the new $200 720p camcorders from Kodak, Aiptek, Exemode are very interesting, hopefully one of these shoots good enough quality in terms of optics. If not I think the Sanyo HD1000, HD700, HD2 are very usable for HD video-blogging now. Samsung, Toshiba are also coming with some that look interesting. And of course the 1080i AVCHD from Sony and Panasonic. I&#039;ve been using my Sony HC1 HDV since September 2005, so I am looking for a solid state HD camcorder upgrade, perhaps one of the $200 ones would do the trick for me, as long as the optical quality and encoding quality is satisfactory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been video-blogging in HD since September 2005 at <a href="http://techvideoblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://techvideoblog.com</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been posting my 500 HD videos in 1280&#215;720 DivX 3.5mbit/s. 95% of computer screens support 720p and it looks great on those.</p>
<p>I think the new $200 720p camcorders from Kodak, Aiptek, Exemode are very interesting, hopefully one of these shoots good enough quality in terms of optics. If not I think the Sanyo HD1000, HD700, HD2 are very usable for HD video-blogging now. Samsung, Toshiba are also coming with some that look interesting. And of course the 1080i AVCHD from Sony and Panasonic. I&#8217;ve been using my Sony HC1 HDV since September 2005, so I am looking for a solid state HD camcorder upgrade, perhaps one of the $200 ones would do the trick for me, as long as the optical quality and encoding quality is satisfactory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151968</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151968</guid>
		<description>@hacintosh - &quot;Power users can add video clips up to 2.5 minutes long (5 minutes for Pros).&quot;

There&#039;s a time limit and I&#039;m not sure if that video is embedable on a website, just viewable on theirs, similar to Vimeo. Also it appears as though the video is just MOVs etc and not converted to HD Flash 9 for better loading times. I&#039;m not 100% but that&#039;s what I got from briefly checking out the site. Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hacintosh &#8211; &#8220;Power users can add video clips up to 2.5 minutes long (5 minutes for Pros).&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a time limit and I&#8217;m not sure if that video is embedable on a website, just viewable on theirs, similar to Vimeo. Also it appears as though the video is just MOVs etc and not converted to HD Flash 9 for better loading times. I&#8217;m not 100% but that&#8217;s what I got from briefly checking out the site. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hacintosh</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151967</link>
		<dc:creator>hacintosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151967</guid>
		<description>SmugMug just recently added DVD quality videos to Power accounts and HD video to Pro accounts.

http://www.smugmug.com/help/video3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SmugMug just recently added DVD quality videos to Power accounts and HD video to Pro accounts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smugmug.com/help/video3" rel="nofollow">http://www.smugmug.com/help/video3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151966</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151966</guid>
		<description>I agree that the time is right. However with HD in mind you may want to go down the set-top box route for distribution. This is because I certainly want to watch that content on my plasma and not on my laptop.

Secondly the bandwidth problem presents huge technical hurdles. Not to mention the net neutrality debate, where the ISPs will come after you (remember BBC iPlayer).

This service will need to exploit P2P like architecture, where content can be downloaded with minimum hops (if it exists). Neither Adobe or Amazon can help here. You will have rely on the likes of Kontiki or Limelight.

PS -- What about IPTV players? Can&#039;t they enable such an infrastructure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the time is right. However with HD in mind you may want to go down the set-top box route for distribution. This is because I certainly want to watch that content on my plasma and not on my laptop.</p>
<p>Secondly the bandwidth problem presents huge technical hurdles. Not to mention the net neutrality debate, where the ISPs will come after you (remember BBC iPlayer).</p>
<p>This service will need to exploit P2P like architecture, where content can be downloaded with minimum hops (if it exists). Neither Adobe or Amazon can help here. You will have rely on the likes of Kontiki or Limelight.</p>
<p>PS &#8212; What about IPTV players? Can&#8217;t they enable such an infrastructure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sox</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151965</link>
		<dc:creator>sox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 14:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151965</guid>
		<description>just wanted to say that this is one of the most level-headed observations i&#039;ve seen on the current state of HD - particularly from the cost/benefit analysis perspective. i would also encourage you to dig deeper into the scalability, and more importantly potential performance issues related with running a large-scale video serving business off the s3 platform, spoke-n-hub vs. the edge model of cdn, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wanted to say that this is one of the most level-headed observations i&#8217;ve seen on the current state of HD &#8211; particularly from the cost/benefit analysis perspective. i would also encourage you to dig deeper into the scalability, and more importantly potential performance issues related with running a large-scale video serving business off the s3 platform, spoke-n-hub vs. the edge model of cdn, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mitry</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151959</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151959</guid>
		<description>I manage technology for a medium sized church and we would be very interested in being able to serve HD quality video, both on demand and live (if possible, this may need to wait until multicasting matures).  We currently use Amazon S3 for delivering some of our content and it works great but we lack the technical expertise to create a platform that would be convenient for other churches and similar venues to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I manage technology for a medium sized church and we would be very interested in being able to serve HD quality video, both on demand and live (if possible, this may need to wait until multicasting matures).  We currently use Amazon S3 for delivering some of our content and it works great but we lack the technical expertise to create a platform that would be convenient for other churches and similar venues to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manos</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151958</link>
		<dc:creator>manos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 09:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151958</guid>
		<description>What camcorder to you get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What camcorder to you get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Falkowski</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151955</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Falkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151955</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t know Vimeo couldn&#039;t embed the HD video content, that&#039;s kind of a bummer. Sounds like a good idea since I&#039;d bet many people are disenchanted by YouTube&#039;s quality limitations.

Running Windows at least, watching HD movie trailers is a pain because Quicktime launches externally (and sporadically) and why bother with WMV-HD. If studios published in FLV format I would go there to watch new trailers for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know Vimeo couldn&#8217;t embed the HD video content, that&#8217;s kind of a bummer. Sounds like a good idea since I&#8217;d bet many people are disenchanted by YouTube&#8217;s quality limitations.</p>
<p>Running Windows at least, watching HD movie trailers is a pain because Quicktime launches externally (and sporadically) and why bother with WMV-HD. If studios published in FLV format I would go there to watch new trailers for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merry Christmas 2007 &#171; Scobleizer &#8212; Tech geek blogger</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151954</link>
		<dc:creator>Merry Christmas 2007 &#171; Scobleizer &#8212; Tech geek blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151954</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Stamatiou is wondering if it&#8217;s time to start an HD startup. Paul: be careful here. HD video is too hard to deal with from a workflow standpoint. It&#8217;s a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul Stamatiou is wondering if it&#8217;s time to start an HD startup. Paul: be careful here. HD video is too hard to deal with from a workflow standpoint. It&#8217;s a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinu</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151953</link>
		<dc:creator>vinu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151953</guid>
		<description>I love the way you have structured the post. But I think having stayed in US and then going back to India and seeing you tube not working properly ... I think HD on web for US would be what YouTube is for India.

I think practically - some sort of a netflix model would work easily - unless something special happens for bandwidth.

But I would ask this basically - Is there a need? If so what is the market? I certainly don&#039;t see the market for 8MB photos version of flickr! Hope you get my point.

Niche market however will surely exist. Disney, Big well-known independent artist. you have to think of it in a bootstrap way. Not for common you and me :-). Of course, unless you are rich and in the US/South Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the way you have structured the post. But I think having stayed in US and then going back to India and seeing you tube not working properly &#8230; I think HD on web for US would be what YouTube is for India.</p>
<p>I think practically &#8211; some sort of a netflix model would work easily &#8211; unless something special happens for bandwidth.</p>
<p>But I would ask this basically &#8211; Is there a need? If so what is the market? I certainly don&#8217;t see the market for 8MB photos version of flickr! Hope you get my point.</p>
<p>Niche market however will surely exist. Disney, Big well-known independent artist. you have to think of it in a bootstrap way. Not for common you and me :-). Of course, unless you are rich and in the US/South Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Brusilovsky</title>
		<link>http://paulstamatiou.com/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service#comment-151952</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Brusilovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/12/25/make-this-startup-hd-video-serving-service/#comment-151952</guid>
		<description>I would use this service to get the word out. With so many people doing the same things, its hard to be unique :)

Great article Paul!

Talk soon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would use this service to get the word out. With so many people doing the same things, its hard to be unique :)</p>
<p>Great article Paul!</p>
<p>Talk soon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
