Thanks to a comment from Jim Karagiannis, I recently discovered Intype. Intype will be pretty much as close as you can get to TextMate’s perfection on Windows. I say “will be” because Intype is only in the early stage of development, but I can already tell it’s headed in the right direction. Those familiar with TextMate won’t have trouble adapting to Intype’s familiar interface.
Features
Let me show you a brief overview of Intype’s features. First off, you’ll notice the stylish green logo – a far cry from the Crimson Editor’s goofy looking logo. The main interface is basic and laid out similarly to TextMate with line and column counts at the bottom, adjacent to the language parsing selector. Unlike TextMate however, Intype doesn’t yet have a tabbed workspace.
Intype preferences are only basic at the moment, but it has 17 themes. Cobalt FTW.
Intype comes with several bundles by default. In the above screenshot, the highlighted bundle menu item created the highlighted text in the CSS file behind it. Intype has growing support for TextMate bundles as well:
TextMate bundle consists of snippets, commands and grammars. Grammars and theme files are platform-independent, they are supported. Commands and snippets use shell code, which is different on Windows and Mac, so it is not possible to transfer them.
Intype is free during the alpha and beta development phases but once it reaches release 1.0 it will be priced similarly to TextMate.
Intype will cost between $25 to $45 (€20 to €35). One license will be valid for one version of Intype and all updates for this version (for example version 1.0 with updates until version 1.9).
Is it worth it?
Before you consider switching to Intype completely you must understand that it is in a very unfinished and barely implemented state. I compare it to TextMate in very light terms. Intype has a long way to go until I can write a real comparison review between Intype and TextMate. I do, however, encourage you to download it and peek around. The Intype blog has several screencasts showing off Intype’s features and are definitely worth checking out.
What Windows text editor do you use? Will you switch to Intype? Oh I almost forgot to mention: the current alpha release of Intype does not have an undo command, use at your own risk. UPDATE: the current version now has undo/redo.
Update: The next release will have undo/redo as well as drag and drop functionality. Thanks to Avinash for that information. Take a look at the upcoming feature request list.
Other Windows text editors include Crimson Editor, TextPad, Notepad++, Programmer’s Notepad, Notepad 2, Zulupad, JujuEdit, TopStyle, EditPlus and countless others.
Tweet This
Stumble This
{ 4 trackbacks }
{ 53 comments… read them below or add one }
Woah o_O This is maybe a little too similar to TextMate. I’ll check it out because this could definitely be the missing editor for Windows — but I wonder how the people at Macromates feel about this?
More from author
@Mike, the Intype developers had this to say on the issue:
More from author
Yep, like you say “Intype has a long way to go”. Even if it’s in the early stages, it seems odd to me that the Undo command isn’t already implemented.
Other than that, so far so good. This software could beat the crap out of other editors for Windows.
More from author
It’s interesting that there’s no Perl in the language list yet. And there’s no Ruby without Rails either, which is kind of funny.
More from author
There’s no Perl but I see a standalone Ruby under “reStructured Text”.. assuming you were referring to the language parsing, not bundles.
More from author
Yeah, I was looking at the parsing menu in the parsing pop-up context menu.
More from author
Paul……all this Windows talk is making me nervous.
More from author
@Dennis: According to Mint, 63% of my readers use Windows, so maybe a few Windows-related articles here and there will keep them satisfied. =) Don’t worry, I’m still an Apple fanboy at heart.
More from author
And, some of us are platform agnostic and don’t really care which platform we’re using and run Linux, Windows and Mac across the multiple machines they use. I like good tools on every platform I run.
Of course, now that I’m using jEdit on all of those platforms (with the same config everwhere), it’s going to take a serious contender to get me to switch away.
More from author
I’ve been using Notepadd++ for quite a while now…I checked out Intype a few days ago, and currently it’s not worth it at all. Once Intype starts getting more features (and an undo command ;)), I might take another look.
More from author
Would really be cool if it natively supported TextMate bundles… the number of bundles would explode!
More from author
I am (and have been for a while) active on the Intype forums, and know that the next release is going to have undo/redo (I know it’s a little strange that it isn’t already implemented, I brought up the complaint a while back already) as well as drag/drop support. If you go to the forums, there is a set of feature requests, as well as posts highlighting the feature roadmap.
I completely agree that Intype is the missing editor for Windows–it beats the pants off “e”, the other Intype-style editor.
Any Linux users–how’s Scribes?
More from author
Cheers. I’ve been looking for something like this for ages.
More from author
This seems to be more promising than the e editor, which claims to be the text editor clone for windows, even the websites layout is way cooler :)
More from author
It’s a text editor, and at the moment is as powerful as VI when you don’t know -any- command. I suppose I’ll look at it again when it has some features, to see if it gets better than Notepad2 ( http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html ) that, btw, is 250KB, open source, and has syntax hilighting and regural expression. But no “stylish green logo”, indeed.
More from author
sorry, i meant to say, textmate clone, not text editor clone – shame
More from author
Yeah, the “stylish green logo” is sooo web 2.0, I love how the internet is changing with these new companies paying attention to style in this generation.
BTW, I’m just kidding.
Thanks for the info Paul, looks like I might not have to succumb to the lure of Textmate afterall.
More from author
I use Notepad2. Works great.
While I use TextMate on my Mac, for years I’ve used SciTE on Windows. It’s everything I’ve needed — syntax highlighting, regular expressions, and a tabbed interface. It’s a far cry from TextMate, but for some reason I’ve always felt like I’ve coded faster in SciTE than anything else.
More from author
Notepad++ for the win…
More from author
Scribes is great. I am using it on ubuntu. My favorite for quick work, but big projects still have me in Jedit. It has a lot of cool features that make it a lot of fun to use. It does kind of make you do things their way though. It recently moved to a plugin system. That, i think will make it even more complete as others begin to write plugins for it.
More from author
I agree with some other commenters in this post. Notepad++ or Notepad 2 are both pretty awesome for a quick editing of codes/kernels/batch scripts and so forth.
Although, I must confess..intype looks pretty sleek and Web 2.0- ish.
More from author
context has been doing all this stuff for years…..
http://www.context.cx/
More from author
Notepad2 and Notepad++ are great editors, but they are missing some really nice features.
More from author
It’s ugly as poo, but I’m still a heavy user of UltraEdit when I’m using my PC. On my Mac, TextWrangler.
More from author
Notepad2 and Notepad++ don’t have code snippets, AFAIK.
Notepad2 has replaced Notepad for me, and I just use it for quick little things.
More from author
I take back what I wrote previously. After trying out Intype, all I can say is “Swwweet”. The bundle feature and the ability to transmutate the themes is also equally awesome.
More from author
i suggest you take a look a the e-texteditor e. it’s not as good looking as intype (yet!) but it’s so much more advanced and has pretty unique features.
i even recommend it for production use :)
http://e-texteditor.com/
Even though its completely unusable right now, I love this editor. It definately mimicks the “ui experience” of textmate. Once they get it functional (folder based projects), keymapping, tons of other stuff it will be the premiere editor on Windows.
I dont think Macromates is going to mind as they have no interest in building a Windows version.
Ooh very nice and looks promising! I currently use Notepad++ when on Windows, but looks like Intype is going to change that!
More from author
Honestly, I just use XEmacs for Windows.
Supports syntax highlighting and indentation for pretty much any programming language.
More from author
http://e-texteditor.com/ is at this point definitely the textmate clone for windows to use at the moment. Intype might get there, but “e” is, I would say, already there.
Check out Notepad++; it i much better than TextMate and already does what this is trying to do…
http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm
More from author
Crimson Editor is still my favorite. This one looks a little too much like TextMate but doesn’t perform like it.
More from author
People.. please stop saying e-texteditor is like TextMate. It’s a fine editor (I tried it for a while before switching back to Notepad++), but they couldnt be more different.
Doesn’t anyone here like Ultra Edit? http://ultraedit.com
It supports tons of languages and it’s search and replace is really fast even on large files. Supports macros, code folding, etc., etc.
notepad++
it’s open source and already mature :)
More from author
That’s all nice and so, but when are we going to see such stuff on linux? I mean… Yeah we have emacs, eclipse (and all the stuff made on it), countless shell editors (nano, vi, vim, joe), and every desktop has it’s own text editor (gEdit for gnome)… But where is the really cool stuff like you mac users have with text mate?
Actually I use bluefish for quick edits like config files, and eclipse for the big fish development. I might have a look at this. Maybe.
Thanks, Paul.
More from author
Even though inType is still in Alpha development sage, I’ve used it since its early release. And so far I’m loving it and their upcoming list of features appears to be very promising. I can’t wait until they release a full project release.
More from author
I’m using Komodo Edit 4.0 on my Windows and Scribe for my Ubuntu and they’re far more better than inType for now.
Still no mention of PSPad?? Definitely my favourite!
More from author
Is it shareware or freeware? Nice editor at all. Especially 17 themes surprised me
More from author
I use Notepad++ for CSS/XHTML/basic PHP and jEdit for more complex PHP/C/Verilog etc. And, um, I code in Bitstream Vera Sans Mono, which is waaaay better than Courier New.
More from author
Am an Ultraedit man. Simple, Lame, Bland, Simple. Awesome batch replacing functionality. Support to import any kind of doc templates.
More from author
Another good alternative to Courier: Inconsolata.
More from author
I wish Inconsolata was available as a TrueType font as well. jEdit doesn’t handle the OpenType format. I tried opening the font source in FontForge and exporting a TTF, but the result wasn’t sharp at all, so I’m not sure what I did wrong (I’m not a font designer by any stretch).
More from author
If you need a TTF alternative to Inconsolata, and you have Windows, you can download Microsoft’s Consolas font on which Inconsolata was partly based. It’s good as well. It checks whether you have Visual Studio installed, but you can install the free Visual Studio Web Express Edition then uninstall it afterwards.
For jEdit I’m using a proportional font (Franklin Gothic) and it looks fabulous – http://jonaquino.blogspot.com/2007/02/proportional-fonts-for-programming.html
More from author
Yeah, I do use Consolas quite a bit. It’s what I’m using in my Console/Powershell windows, etc. I just like Inconsolata’s open source freedom and would prefer to use it to Microsoft’s offering if I could just get it to look as smooth as Consolas.
I’ll have to give Franklin a shot in the text editor and see how I like it.
More from author
Without basic search functionality, it’s currently a pain to use for producing major work. But at this point, I guess they’re only interested in you catching their bugs, as this is going to be a for-pay product. So if you can produce anything with it while helping them debug it, then you’re in luck. It really is powerful and looks like it will be a great product in the end.
More from author
I’ve been playing with Intype for more than a month and I do like it, but NoteTab has been the best of the code editors I’ve used (even though I like Crimson Editor’s syntax highlighting better). Even the free “light” version of NoteTab has advantages over Intype, because NoteTab allows you to program or rewrite its internal code modules so you can customize it to your needs.
There’s a community of NoteTab users continually working on new stuff to share, too.
I can envision that something like that could evolve out of Intype, which in some ways has a nicer interface. Some of the Intype syntax highlighting schemes are very easy on the eyes, and I think it will be a great tool for people who work with a wide variety of code in raw form.
Anyone looking at InType should give e (http://www.e-texteditor.com/) a go. It’s made huge strides in the last couple of months.
hey great editor! i liked a lot apple’s textmate.. This is a good replacement on win
More from author
I could say it is the best editor of all free editors. Boundles is number one feature that i use.
Waiting for more realizes!!! :) programmers of intype I’m waiting for 0.3 stable :)
Oh one think that i don’t like it is a project panel :/ i can’t do SVN commits from it :/
More from author