EMI Announces DRM-free Music on iTunes

April 2, 2007

April 2nd 2007. Remember that date as the day DRM died, well at least started to die. It appears as though Steve Jobs’ call to abolish DRM was heard by someone at EMI, who will begin selling DRM-free music on the iTunes Store.

Apple has announced that iTunes will make individual AAC format tracks available from EMI artists at twice the sound quality of existing downloads, with their DRM removed, at a price of $1.29/€1.29/£0.99. iTunes will continue to offer consumers the ability to pay $0.99/€0.99/£0.79 for standard sound quality tracks with DRM still applied.

Unfortunately, the DRM-free music costs a bit more, but it’s a start. I must run to class, but let me know what you think of this news. Be sure to check out TechMeme to get a scope of how big this news really is.


  • Get notified of new posts by RSS or email.

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Luke April 2, 2007 at 10:47 am

great news, although the need for a 30c price hike seems to be clearly a demand of emi, so at least apple kept the 99c model for users who are happy with drm.

but good news alround hopefully other labels will follow shortly.

Reply

M April 2, 2007 at 10:56 am

I have stuck a transcription of the Q & A at the end of the presentation on my blog, at http://musingsonamac.com/blog/2007/04/emi-slides.html

Overall the response has been positive, I wouldn’t call EMI going DRM free the day it started to die. Maybe had a small Myocardial embolism that can get much worse if the sales of DRM Free HQ tracks and albums take off.

Steve spoke about setting iTunes to default to DRM free tracks if available. Is your time worth enough to spend the $0.30 or 20p instead of re ripping the track yourself. Will you hear a difference, honestly, in a Hi-Fi track versus a current option… I might if I’m playing through my best headphones and not off my macbook pro which adds a subtle buzz anyway… is that worth 20 pence.

Maybe.

Reply

Frank 'viperteq' Young April 2, 2007 at 11:33 am

It’s also a clearer way of distinquishing the DRM music from the non-DRM music…..

Reply

Sebastian April 2, 2007 at 11:51 am

This is really, really great! DRM and the low quality were the only things that held me back from buying more than the occasional song.

I don’t care about the 30 cents – albums stay at the same price!

Reply

Michele April 2, 2007 at 3:03 pm

I’m with the Sebastian: I think it’s a very good news! I hope more labels will jump on the DRM-free bandwagon… :)

Reply

Ian Halliday April 2, 2007 at 4:41 pm

The most radical thing about this snippet of news for me is that I heard it first on BBC news! I came online and there was hardly anything about this deal anywhere for at least 5 minutes :) Traditional media isn’t dead yet then :p

As for the DRM-Free deal itself – about time. When the supposedly intelligent people behind all the big media providers realise that DRM drives piracy not the other way round? People will allways take the easier route. If the easier route happens to be ‘free’ and illegal, then that’s the route people are going to take. Not only do legal downloads have to be easier than using bit torrent etc, they need to be fair.

I am happy to pay for content if it becomes mine to use as I please (within reason). Lets face it, DRM is one of the biggest wastes of time and money all round in this industry. The sooner it goes the better!

Reply

Adam April 3, 2007 at 11:08 am

This, along with the hopeful EU grumbling at iTunes price hitch for those in the UK and Europe as opposed to the US is making iTunes more attractive all the time. That said, since allofmp3 got nobbled by Visa I have no choice except iTunes or PirateBay, and my guilt is getting the better of me these days.

Reply

Brian Pinard April 7, 2007 at 4:36 pm

So if they’re selling us “premium” quality tracks now, what WERE they selling us before? #!%$@

Reply

Bryan Villarin April 19, 2007 at 3:06 pm

Paul: Any idea why this posts keeps updating in Bloglines?

Reply

Paul Stamatiou April 19, 2007 at 3:13 pm

@Bryan – No idea, I haven’t touched this post since it was first published. The thing you speak of has happened once before with another post. It stopped doing that after it left my feed (most recent 35 posts).

Reply

Bryan Villarin April 19, 2007 at 3:18 pm

@Paul: Alright, no worries. If it was more feeds, I might get irritated; in this case, it’s just you. ;)

Reply

Nicole May 2, 2007 at 1:01 pm

Like Bryan, I’m seeing this post everyday in Bloglines (twice today already). I guess I’ll just ride this one out. :)

Reply

Bryan Villarin May 2, 2007 at 1:14 pm

Unlike Nicole, I’ve unsubscribed from here.

I juss kidding!

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: