Digg v3.0 Review

Maybe, just maybe, Digg should revise its whole digs system. Its counterintuitive to first click on a digg icon and then read a story, or even first open the story and then come back to digg (whether its back to a previous tab or back to another way) to digg for it. Sure, using frames and locking the user is equally not-the-right-thing-to-do, but they should find a way for it to make more sense.

Reply   More from author

Many times I will read a headline and automatically digg it out of excitement before reading it. Then I’ll read it and realize that the story didn’t go past my digg-worthiness threshold.

I think that this is the reason that while Digg is so popular, it still hasn’t caught on past the tech crowd. It’s user centered but often stories that have no real relevance or provide true noteworthy information are the ones that are getting dugg because people are just going off of the headline and clicking digg without reading the whole story.

I would read something that sounded awesome and then I would read the comments which would point out inaccuracies and other things, causing me to revoke my vote.

Shouldn’t the whole article including the comments be read before casting a vote anyway?

Reply   More from author

Hey Paul, thanks for the link up :)
I thought undigging was new too, but then I read it wasn’t..guess we both missed it :P

Reply   More from author

Interesting post. I was going throught TechCrunch’s archives, when I found a review of the Digg v1. Mildly entertaining. I wrote a post about, which you can read here:

http://www.micahville.com/2007/07/15/a-first-look-at-digg/

Reply   More from author